Yes it's correct.
Because prepositions can often by exchanged for one another (in this case the prepositions are "by" and on"), either way is grammatically correct in this sentence. I tripped on accident or I tripped by accident. Both are acceptable. Comment: In British English, I'm pretty sure "by accident" is the "proper" form. Oddly enough, "I tripped on purpose" is correct.
Technically the phrase "Whom is this for" is the grammatically correct version of this statement, but in modernized English there are a fair amount of people who don't know the difference between "who," and "whom." So in a casual situation, or when talking informally, the phrase "Who is this for" is acceptable--enough, but not only do you sound more intelligent when you use the word "whom" correctly, but also it's the correct way of using the language. Simply, it is not technically correct, but in a casual situation, it is acceptable.
Enough is the correct spelling.
You must out part of your sentence. What you gave is a simple sentence without any dependent clause.In this sentence: If it is not cool enough for a picnic, we will stay home.it is not cool enough for a picnic is a cinditional clause.
The correct spelling is "enough"
It should read, "not enough to want to change himself/herself."
Your question wasn't even grammatically correct enough for me to understand what you were asking.
This question is not grammatically correct enough to make sense of. Therefore, it is not possible for me to provide an appropriately formed answer to it.
Because prepositions can often by exchanged for one another (in this case the prepositions are "by" and on"), either way is grammatically correct in this sentence. I tripped on accident or I tripped by accident. Both are acceptable. Comment: In British English, I'm pretty sure "by accident" is the "proper" form. Oddly enough, "I tripped on purpose" is correct.
In the sentence, The theater was closed but we didn't have enough money to see it anyway, "it" has an incorrect reference. It is missing the correct noun.The theater was closed, but we didn't have enough money to see the movie anyway.
Sounds correct enough for it to make sense to the reader. So, every sentence can be an utterance?
This is not a sentence. There is no verb. ("Parking" is used as a gerund.) And I don't know what a "baement" is.If you want to make it into a sentence, you could do something like "There is free parking in the baement[sic] carpark." Of course, if you are just trying to put up a sign directing cars to the parking area rather than doing an English homework assignment, the original phrase is more than enough to adequately convey the message.
As a plural noun. The sentence thus produced may or may not make much sense, but it will be grammatically correct: "Uncle Don's polymers were giving him trouble again, so we knew he wouldn't be out of the bathroom any time soon." You should note that English teachers tend to disapprove of students clever enough to take advantage of such loopholes in their instructions, so I don't recommend you actually use the above sentence on a homework assignment.
This sentence is incorrect. Bored means not interested in something, or not finding something stimulating enough to hold your attention. The correct word is board. The family will board the plane.
A lack of proper sleep is called Sleep Deprivation. In some people it has been known to reduce their grammatical abilities, especially with regards to question phrasing. An example would be, "What does getting enough sleep affect a person?", instead of the more grammatically correct "Why am I answering this question?"
A sentence using the word "has" with the word "cinema" is easy enough and can be correct. One such sentence is "Has he gone to the cinema yet?". Another possibility is "We went to the cinema and discovered that he has seen that film already".
yes u do sweat when u excercise I would assume you do not exercise hard enough or long enough if you don't sweat.