0
They will check if the person who provided the information and evidence is thrustworthy.After that,they will check whether the evidence is consistant by considering if it contains statements that have similar meaning.In the end,they will corroborate something that is said or reported means to provide information to support.By doing all these,they will know if their desciption of the past is factual.They can also ask other historian to check their description.
What else can I help you with?
Because all sources are biased historians approach sources with a what?
skeptism
which statement best explains why secondary sources are important to historians?
(Apex) They summarize conclusions about primary sources.
Historians bias rule is a guideline that recognizes that all sources?
biased
Why is important to read critically the works of early historians such as herodotus or thucydides?
Early historians often used information from unverifable sources.
Know if the information reported is fair and reliable?
To determine if the information being reported is fair and reliable one would have to check the reliability of the sources. This can be done by contacting the sources directly, and/or further investigation.
Do you think primary sources or secondary sources are more valuable to modern historians and why?
Primary sources are more valuable to modern historians because they are more reliable.
Why do historians not find livy a reliable source of information?
They do find reliable sources. Without that their work is invalid and wrong.
Why Historians are concerned with accuracy of their writings and readings but are also aware of?
Historians are concerned with accuracy to ensure that the information they provide is reliable and can be trusted by others. They are also aware of the limitations of historical sources, such as bias or incomplete information, and strive to critically evaluate and interpret these sources to present a well-rounded and nuanced understanding of the past.
Why does bias usually make a source less reliable for historians?
Bias can make a source less reliable for historians because it may distort the facts or present a skewed interpretation of events to serve a particular agenda. When a source reflects the subjective views or interests of its creator, it limits the objectivity necessary for accurate historical analysis. This can lead to a misrepresentation of the past, making it challenging for historians to draw balanced conclusions. Consequently, historians must critically evaluate sources for bias to ensure a more nuanced understanding of history.
Historians cross-check their research?
Historians cross-check their research by consulting multiple sources to verify information and ensure accuracy. This process involves comparing accounts, analyzing data, and looking for corroborating evidence from different perspectives to construct a more comprehensive understanding of historical events. By verifying information in this way, historians aim to establish a more reliable and nuanced interpretation of the past.
Why is it harder for a historian to use sources than for a detective?
Historians often deal with incomplete, biased, or conflicting sources, making it challenging to piece together an accurate narrative. Unlike detectives who may have access to physical evidence, historians must interpret and analyze historical documents to construct their understanding of the past. Additionally, historical sources may be limited by the perspectives or agendas of their creators, requiring historians to critically evaluate their reliability.
What tools do historians use?
Primary sources, secondary sources, and oral history.
How can you ensure the accuracy and authenticity of information by making your own checks?
You can ensure the accuracy and authenticity of information by verifying the sources, cross-referencing information with reliable sources, and critically evaluating the credibility of the information presented.
Why is it harder for a historian to use sources than for a detectives?
Many sources that historians use are not as reliable as those used by a detective. They have to compile different sources from the same era to determine their accuracy.
When was Reliable Sources created?
Reliable Sources was created in 1992.
What are the two sources that historians use?
primary sources and secondary sources.
What do historians use to check for accuracy?
Historians use a variety of primary sources such as documents, artifacts, and eyewitness accounts to check for accuracy in historical research. They also cross-reference information from multiple sources and analyze the context in which historical events took place to ensure accuracy in their interpretations. Additionally, historians may use scholarly research and peer-reviewed sources to verify the accuracy of their findings.
