0
Is De Saussure a mentalist linguist or structuralist or both?
Algeriannour
Ferdinand de Saussure was a mentalist, linguist, and structuralist. He is widely considered one of the fathers of 20th-century linguistics and semiotics/semiology.
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the difference between langue and parole?
A langue ( "tongue") is a language, in which a parole ( from parabola) is a spoken word.---------langue nthe French word for "language". The term was used by the linguistSaussure to mean the system of a language, that is the arrangement ofsounds and words which speakers of a language have a shared knowledgeof or, as Saussure said, "agree to use". Langue is the "ideal" form of alanguage. Saussure called the actual use of language by people in speechor writing "parole".Saussure's distinction between "langue" and "parole" is similar toChomsky's distinction between COMPETENCE and PERFORMANCE. Butwhereas for Saussure the repository of "langue" is the SPEECH COMMUNITY,for Chomsky the repository of "competence" is the "idealspeaker/hearer". So Saussure's distinction is basically sociolinguistic (seeSOCIOLINGUISTICS) whereas Chomsky's is basically psycholinguisticRichrds, J.C & Schmidt (2002). Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. Longman
What is structuralism in linguistics. discuss the four major methodological principles put forward by Saussure giving examples where necessary?
Structuralism in linguistics refers to the thought that language was a system of signs that lay under actually speech.Saussure believed that language is composed of two parts: langue (the abstract system of language internalized by a given speech community) and parole (the individual acts of speech). Because the parole differed so greatly over regions and people, he focused on langue. There, he found that there existed a linguistic unit, which he called a sign. The four methodologies of Saussure are based off of the sign. It is composed of both a signifier (the sound) and the signified (the concept).His first methodology is called Arbitrariness: there is no natural reason why any particular sign should be attached to a particular concept. For instance, the French word bœuf means both "ox" and "beef". It is different parts of the world that assign different meanings to different things. Another case of this is found in the Inuits: they have over a dozen words for "snow".The second methodology is Value: the worth of a sign is determined by all other signs in the langue. All words in the Inuit language referring to snow could be interchangeable, but they have been limited by each others' value: each word refers to a different kind of snow.The third methodology is Relations: language works through the relations of differences, which place signs in opposition to one another. Words can be formed into groups (such as fight, fighter, fighting) but they have been set apart by the mind. They all relate to one another by similarity, but differ in value.His fourth methodology is Synchronics: the thought that a language can be studied as a complete system at a given point in time. Saussure said that language is "a system of pure values which are determined by nothing except the momentary arrangements of its terms." So, the noun tramp was originally used to refer to a wanderer. Nowadays it means a promiscuous woman. We do not need to know how it came to be this way, but we need know only that it is what is meant now.
What is the difference between the signifier and the signified according to Ferdinand de Saussure?
derrida advocates a third element in signification-- there is the signified, the signifier and the interpretant. In other words, there is no meaning without the interpreter, who reads the signified in the signifier and decides what exactly is being communicated. Furthermore, Derrida, as a deconstructionist, privileges polysemy-- there are many signifieds within one signifier, and these cannot be separated without an inherent violence unto the text. Whereas Saussure finds the link between signified and signifier as arbitrary, Derrida finds it to be too complicated to map onto such a simplistic structure. For example, the Greek word Pharmakon may mean either poison or medicine. It is the interpreter's job (or rather the translator's job) to interpret the word poison or medicine, thereby translating both the Greek word Pharmakon to the English word, and the Greek word poison to the Greek word medicine. It is an interior translation that takes place within the word itself, pharmakon-poison to pharmakon-medicine. This is quite difficult to explain in less than an essay, so you should really read Derrida himself instead of looking for some online study guide.
Which is right both of them are or both of them is?
i think, it will be; "both of them are" since both means at least 2. so we are talking about double, and both takes plurals. as a result:=> both of them are...
Which is correct Our best wishes to you both or best wishes to both of you?
Our best wishes to you both.
What is the difference between Saussure's and Chomsky'sopinion about the object of linguistic?
Saussure focused on the structure and system of language, emphasizing the relationship between signifier and signified in creating meaning. Chomsky, on the other hand, emphasized universal grammar and the innate cognitive structures that enable humans to acquire language. While Saussure's focus was more on the synchronic aspects of language, Chomsky's work delved into both synchronic and diachronic aspects, such as language acquisition and evolution.
Do questions answered on the French WikiAnswers count as actions on the English site?
No, however they do count towards the "Linguist" badge on both the international and English site.
What is the difference between langue and parole?
A langue ( "tongue") is a language, in which a parole ( from parabola) is a spoken word.---------langue nthe French word for "language". The term was used by the linguistSaussure to mean the system of a language, that is the arrangement ofsounds and words which speakers of a language have a shared knowledgeof or, as Saussure said, "agree to use". Langue is the "ideal" form of alanguage. Saussure called the actual use of language by people in speechor writing "parole".Saussure's distinction between "langue" and "parole" is similar toChomsky's distinction between COMPETENCE and PERFORMANCE. Butwhereas for Saussure the repository of "langue" is the SPEECH COMMUNITY,for Chomsky the repository of "competence" is the "idealspeaker/hearer". So Saussure's distinction is basically sociolinguistic (seeSOCIOLINGUISTICS) whereas Chomsky's is basically psycholinguisticRichrds, J.C & Schmidt (2002). Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. Longman
How did Ferdinand de Saussure revolutionize linguistic theory?
Ferdinand de Saussure revolutionized linguistic theory by introducing structuralism, emphasizing the importance of the system of language over individual words. He also popularized the concepts of langue (the abstract system of language) and parole (actual speech), highlighting the difference between language structure and its usage. Saussure's ideas laid the foundation for modern structural linguistics and semiotics.
Speak on the phone or talk on the phone?
The verbs to 'talk' and to 'speak' both mean to 'utter words'. In the context of communicating on a phone, either is appropriate.
What are the ratings and certificates for The Mentalist - 2008 The Thin Red Line 1-8?
The rating of a television show can refer to two different things--its Nielson rating, meaning how popular it is, and its content rating, which refers to how mature the show is. Unfortunately, both of these ratings change from one episode to another, so there is no blanket statement for either rating regarding The Mentalist as a whole.
What is the difference between functionalism and feminism?
hey! Both feminism and Functionalism operate on a macro approach i.e. they look at the big picture when investigating society. They both come under the structuralist approach i.e. they view society as more important than the individial They both also argue that education prepares pupils for their position in an unequal society That's as much as i can think of for now, but if i remember anymore I'll fill it in!!
How do you pronounce Ferdinand de Saussure's last name?
So soor (the second sound is a long oo sound with 'r' pronounced from the back of the throat at the end) Both syllables are equal - one isn't stressed more than the other one.another answer:so-sür (with stress on second part)
How the poststructuralism critisises structuralism?
Post-structuralism may be understood as a critical response to the basic assumptions of structuralism. Structuralism was a fashionable movement in France in the 1950s and 1960s, that studied the underlying structures inherent in cultural products (such as texts), and utilizes analytical concepts from linguistics, psychology,anthropology and other fields to understand and interpret those structures. Although the structuralist movement fostered critical inquiry into these structures, it emphasized logical and scientific results. Many structuralists sought to integrate their work into pre-existing bodies of knowledge. This was observed in the work ofFerdinand de Saussure in linguistics, Claude Lévi-Strauss in anthropology, and many early twentieth-century psychologists. The general assumptions of post-structuralism derive from critique of structuralist premises. Specifically, post-structuralism holds that the study of underlying structures is itself culturally conditioned and therefore subject to myriad biases and misinterpretations. To understand an object (e.g., one of the many meanings of a text), it is necessary to study both the object itself, and the systems of knowledge which were coordinated to produce the object. In this way, post-structuralism positions itself as a study of how knowledge is produced.
Can anyone recommend a tv show for someone who loved Mad Men and the wire?
justified,prison break,24,breaking bad,the tudors,supernatural,sapranos,white collar,burn notice are all great shows. also try the mentalist and the shield both crime dramas
Who was Maria Agnesi?
Maria Agnesi was an Italian linguist, mathematician, and philosopher.Agnesi is credited with writing the first book discussing both differential and integral calculus.She was an honorary member of the faculty at the University of Bologna. According to Dirk Jan Struik, Agnesi is "the first important woman mathematician since Hypatia(fifth century A.D.)".
Why is there animosity between linguists and general semantics?
As with any difference of ideals, linguists (pragmatics) and general semantics may argue on a word or phrase if both perceive the words individually. Linguistics focuses on the structure with the sound, sight, grammatical usage and the like while the semantics are only looking at the word for its meaning. Yet it is important to understand that the semantics of a word or phrase is only a part of linguistics and an individual can be both a semanticist and a linguist.
