the word "personnel" is already in a plural form This answer is incorrect. The word "personnel" is singular. The plural form of "personnel" is "personnels". Personnel may refer to a group of employees or people, but it is still taken as being a singular noun, much like how you can say "one people". People refers to a group of many more people, but in this sense, "people" is ONE THING. So referring to the word "personnel", it is already singular and the plural form is "personnels". The second answer above is incorrect. The word personnel was previously only used in the plural sense. There was no singular form of the word - the singular form would be "member of staff" or something like that. It looks like "personnel" is now also being used as singular, which is okay - language changes. But do not try to make personnel plural by adding an S - this is incorrect and never used.
No, because there are not 100 plural pronouns.The plural pronouns are:weusyou (can be singular or plural)theythemthesethoseouroursyour (can be singular or plural)yours (can be singular or plural)theirtheirsourselvesyourselvesthemselvesbothfewfewermanyothersseveralall (can be singular or plural)any (can be singular or plural)more (can be singular or plural)most (can be singular or plural)none (can be singular or plural)some (can be singular or plural)such (can be singular or plural)
Are is plural. "Is" is singular. For example, "There is a glove on the chair". That is singular. "There are gloves on the chair". That is plural.
singular Singular: plural is coats
Who may be singular or plural.
Its like the word family. It refers to a group of people (plural) but is a the noun personnel is singular.
the word "personnel" is already in a plural form This answer is incorrect. The word "personnel" is singular. The plural form of "personnel" is "personnels". Personnel may refer to a group of employees or people, but it is still taken as being a singular noun, much like how you can say "one people". People refers to a group of many more people, but in this sense, "people" is ONE THING. So referring to the word "personnel", it is already singular and the plural form is "personnels". The second answer above is incorrect. The word personnel was previously only used in the plural sense. There was no singular form of the word - the singular form would be "member of staff" or something like that. It looks like "personnel" is now also being used as singular, which is okay - language changes. But do not try to make personnel plural by adding an S - this is incorrect and never used.
No, because there are not 100 plural pronouns.The plural pronouns are:weusyou (can be singular or plural)theythemthesethoseouroursyour (can be singular or plural)yours (can be singular or plural)theirtheirsourselvesyourselvesthemselvesbothfewfewermanyothersseveralall (can be singular or plural)any (can be singular or plural)more (can be singular or plural)most (can be singular or plural)none (can be singular or plural)some (can be singular or plural)such (can be singular or plural)
singular and plural
Are is plural. "Is" is singular. For example, "There is a glove on the chair". That is singular. "There are gloves on the chair". That is plural.
practitioner is singular (plural practitioners)sofa is singular (plural sofas)satellite is singular (plural satellites)clips is plural (singular clip)dentist is singular (plural dentists)dollars is plural (singular dollar)article is singular (plural articles)magazines is plural (singular magazine)laminator is singular (laminators is plural)radios is plural (singular radio)
"Has" is singular, e.g. He has, she has. "Have" is plural, e.g. They have, we have. The exception is "I" - e.g. I have.
singular Singular: plural is coats
The word team is singular; the plural form is teams.
This is singular. These is the plural form.
These is plural, this is singular
Who may be singular or plural.