It depends; if the person who created the documentary experienced the events themselves, it is a primary source. However, in many cases, it is a secondary source, which means that the creator of the documentary based it off of experiences other than their own.
It is a primary source because it was taken at the time.
yes,a coin is a primary source
A primary source is a source material that is closely related to the subject discribed with in.
Primary - as it is a document produced at the time. It is not some later report.
Unoriginal Source
Yes.
Usually refers to a primary source such as a journal, photograph, letter, etc.
A primary source.
He might refer to a primary source, which could be a journal of a past president or other source, to show how past idea's are connected to present events, or several other reasons.
The Journal of Private Equity was created in 1997.
A diary, journal, or first-person description of an event written at the time it occurred.
General Grant's Journal is a primary source. A primary source is an eye witness. It is what the person who was there actually saw. Such accounts are extremely important because they give a feel for the era. A secondary source would be what you would hear if one of your parents told you what they heard about World War 2. They would be passing on a story. Also, Jefferson Davis, the president of the Confederacy, also wrote his memoirs. If someone took Grant's Journal and Davis' Memoirs and made a book, that would be a secondary source. Still, it might give a better overall picture of the war. So a primary source is one written by someone who saw what was going on.
International Journal of Private Law was created in 2008.
Australian Journal of Primary Health was created in 1995.
A journal can be considered a secondary source when it analyzes, interprets, or summarizes primary research findings rather than presenting original data or firsthand accounts. For example, a review article in a scientific journal discusses and synthesizes results from multiple studies, providing context and commentary. In this way, it relies on the primary sources of the original research but does not contribute new experimental data itself.
A public source will usually contain less candid thoughts and reactions than one that is intended to be private.
A public source will usually contain less candid thoughts and reactions than one that is intended to be private.