Short answer :
Yes, if used as a compound object. If used as a subject of a verb, then change him to the pronoun " he ".
It depends. "They want you and him to agree" is correct. The object forms of the pronouns are used. For example: They want ; they want you and him; they want you and him to agree. Also correct is "They did it for you and him."
"You and him are going to agree" would not be not correct. The subject form is used : "You and he are going to agree."
For example, you might write something like: "verbs always match nouns in number, and they usually come before the noun.
"That was wrong" is a grammatically correct sentence.
Yes, Almighty God is grammatically correct.
Yes, it is grammatically correct.
This sentence is grammatically correct.
No, it is not grammatically correct. If you want someone to correct it for you, please can you explain what you are trying to refer to?
Yes, 'for free', is grammatically correct.
"Not like that" can be grammatically correct, depending on the context.
Yes! That is grammatically correct!
This is not grammatically correct. The correct form is 'you do not know', or the abbreviated 'you don't know'.
'What a drunkard you are' is a grammatically correct English sentence.
"That was wrong" is a grammatically correct sentence.
Yes, it is grammatically correct.
Yes, Almighty God is grammatically correct.
Sure. It would also be grammatically correct to write He spoggled his nubbix on the goober. Grammatically correct and meaningful are not the same.
The phrase "Is you don't miss me do you" is not grammatically correct. It should be rephrased to something like "Don't you miss me?" to be correct.
No, it is not grammatically correct. The correct way to say it is "your older sister."
Saying, "I am annoyed of the way you behave.", is grammatically correct.