This sentence is grammatically correct.
Yes, except that in the US, this would imply that he was "not wealthy" in the same context as "people with money." A more common phrasing might be "He did not have any money."
"Money's worth" is grammatically correct, especially in the sense of the idiomatic phrase "get one's money's worth" (meaning that you had a satisfactory experience and were very pleased for what you received in returned for whatever you paid for the item or experience).
It depends on the sentence to say whether it its grammatically correct. If someone were to say, for example, "I have no money." Yes, it would be correct. If someone were to say "No, I don't have no money." It would be incorrect because it is a double negative. A double negative is when in one sentence you would use the word "no", or a conjunction with no, as in "don't" or "won't" more than once without a proper comma in place. To correct the example sentence, one might say "No, i don't have any money." or "No, I haven't any money."
"My lawyer advised me to plead not guilty." "Mary will plead with her father and hope that he gives her the money."
As in PONY up the dough- to give it (the money) to the intended recipient for services/products offered in exchange for the cash!
She has money to pay rent" is correct. "She is having money to pay rent" is not grammatically correct, although it might be understood to convey the same meaning.link here >πππππ://πππ.πππππππππ24.πππ/πππππ/372576/πΈπππππππππππππππ/
The correct statement is "He doesn't have any money."
Yes
They cannot that you offered them something and they declined that's there fault.
Yes, 'you and him' is grammatically correct as the object of the verb. For example 'I will divide the money equally between you and him.' However, as the subject of the verb, the correct form is 'you and he'. For example 'You and he are equally to blame.'
First he offered 800 then 1000 then 1200 but thornton still refused
Yes, except that in the US, this would imply that he was "not wealthy" in the same context as "people with money." A more common phrasing might be "He did not have any money."
hire a prostotute to posin them
First he offered 800 then 1000 then 1200 but thornton still refused
A borrowee is an individual or a company that borrows money from a borrower, though this term is not correct. The grammatically correct term is borrowed.ex: XYZ lent money to ABC. XYZ sued the borrowed because it was not receiving its capital back.Although a word 'borrowee' is not a correct term, it is sometimes used in financial world of business to describe an entity that an individual or an institution has 'borrowed' money from, NOT the one borrowing who is the 'borrower.'example:A 'borrower,' out of desperation, 'borrowed' money from a 'borrowee' with high interest rate and caused himself to fall into deeper financial trouble.Also, 'borrowed' is not grammatically correct term of either a 'borrowee' or a 'borrower,' but is only a past form of a verb, 'borrow.'
"Money's worth" is grammatically correct, especially in the sense of the idiomatic phrase "get one's money's worth" (meaning that you had a satisfactory experience and were very pleased for what you received in returned for whatever you paid for the item or experience).
It depends on the sentence to say whether it its grammatically correct. If someone were to say, for example, "I have no money." Yes, it would be correct. If someone were to say "No, I don't have no money." It would be incorrect because it is a double negative. A double negative is when in one sentence you would use the word "no", or a conjunction with no, as in "don't" or "won't" more than once without a proper comma in place. To correct the example sentence, one might say "No, i don't have any money." or "No, I haven't any money."