answersLogoWhite

0

Yes, although somewhat archaic. "Instead" is a shortening of this phrase.

User Avatar

Wiki User

16y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Is irregardless grammatically incorrect?

irregardless is not grammatically correct it is a double negative- the correct term is regardless


Which term is grammatically correct in-charg In-Charge or in charge?

in charge


When is the term Mans accepted?

The term "mans" is not grammatically correct in any situation. The correct plural is "men" and the correct possessive is "man's".


Which sentence is grammatically correct you are on war or you are at war?

The correct sentence is:You are at war.


Which is grammatically correct 'layouting' or laying out'?

Laying out is correct. Layout is a noun so layouting does not make sense.


Is phrase part and parcel grammatically correct?

Yes, it is grammatically correct. "Part and parcel" is a phrase that originated as a legal term in the fifteenth century. It means an essential or integral part.


Is it grammatically correct to say break a vicious circle?

Yes, it is grammatically as well as stylistically correct to speak of breaking a vicious circle. The term "vicious circle" dates from the late 1700s.


Not like that- is this grammatically correct?

"Not like that" can be grammatically correct, depending on the context.


Is 3-Day tour grammatically correct?

Yes! That is grammatically correct!


Is the phrase for free grammatically correct?

Yes, 'for free', is grammatically correct.


Is grammarically a word?

No, "grammarically" is not a word. The correct term is "grammatically," which relates to the rules and structure of language.


You are not knowing is grammatically correct or not?

This is not grammatically correct. The correct form is 'you do not know', or the abbreviated 'you don't know'.