Kelly didn’t have any lunch today.
Kelly didn't have any lunch today.
The correct way to say this would be "Mark HAD lunch." This means he already ate it. You could also say "Mark WILL HAVE lunch," meaning sometime in the future. Another correct sentence would be "Mark HAS lunch." This means that he is in possession of lunch but has not eaten it yet.
What did you have for lunch. It makes much more sense than what did you had for lunch.
Both are correct, but it depends on whether this phrase is the subject of the sentence or the object: grandmother and I went to the park. They bought lunch for grandmother and me.
We did not take our lunch. We have not had our lunch. We have not taken lunch.
Both are correct with different meaning. I'm on lunchmeans either "I'm on my lunch-break" or "I'm the one taking care of the lunch-duty." I'm at lunch means simply means "I'm at lunch."
Yes.
The correct way to say this would be "Mark HAD lunch." This means he already ate it. You could also say "Mark WILL HAVE lunch," meaning sometime in the future. Another correct sentence would be "Mark HAS lunch." This means that he is in possession of lunch but has not eaten it yet.
Yes.
Yes, this is a run-on sentence, because it contains two independent clauses (each can stand alone as a sentence) that are not separated by any punctuation or conjunction.The following are examples of how to correct this error:Before lunch you played volleyball. After lunch you played again.Before lunch you played volleyball; after lunch you played again.Before lunch you played volleyball, and after lunch you played again.
I think the correct way to say it is " Have you eaten a nutritious lunch?" Hope it helps!
No, it should read "Will you have a potluck lunch here, pending reservations?"
I think I would write: "We went shopping after lunch." Or, to be even more correct: "We went shopping after we ate lunch."
What did you have for lunch. It makes much more sense than what did you had for lunch.
The correct form of invitation in "you are invited to lunch" or "you are invited at lunch" is "you are invited to lunch". You could also say, "you are invited to lunch at my house" as this would be grammatically correct.
The prepositional phrase in the sentence is "for lunch."
Breakfast and lunch were . . . "
Both are correct, but it depends on whether this phrase is the subject of the sentence or the object: grandmother and I went to the park. They bought lunch for grandmother and me.