In this case, the word "show" is an intransitiveverb.
Intransitive verbs are action verbs that do NOT have an object receiving the action. There is no object receiving the action of the verb "show" so the verb is intransitive.
Intransitive, because it can't take a direct object. In the pond, fish abound. Fish (subject) abound (verb). The pond abounds with fish. Pond (subject) abounds (verb) with fish (prepositional phrase). But never this: The pond abounds fish. Pond (subject) abounds (verb) fish (direct object). That last construction doesn't exist.
Intransitive verbs: the verb only has a subject. For example: "he runs", "it falls." Transitive verbs: the verb has a subject and a direct object. For example: "she eats fish", "we hunt nothing." Ditransitive verbs: the verb has a subject, a direct object, and an indirect object. For example: "He gives her a flower."
A qualitative observation has to do with things you can't count, "The fish has black scales" is a qualitative observation. A quantitative observation has to do with things you can count, "The fish has 125 scales" is a quantitative observation. You can combine these two, an example would be "The fish has 125 black scales."
You didn't say which meaning of the word you wanted to use. If you mean scale as in a device to measure weight, you could say "I stepped on the scale and prayed that I had lost weight." If you mean scale like a fish or reptile has, you could say "I found a snake scale in the woods." If you mean scale like on a map, you could say "The scale of this map is one inch equals one mile." If you mean scale as in to climb, you could say "We plan to scale Mount Baldy this weekend."
unicorn fish
scales can tell you how old a fish is by the number of rings on a scale
Intransitive, because it can't take a direct object. In the pond, fish abound. Fish (subject) abound (verb). The pond abounds with fish. Pond (subject) abounds (verb) with fish (prepositional phrase). But never this: The pond abounds fish. Pond (subject) abounds (verb) fish (direct object). That last construction doesn't exist.
true
Yes, the scales do overlap. The overlapping makes a more complete covering than if the scales butted up to each other. When the fish bends, the overlapped scales have freedom of movement, yet still keep the covering of the body intact.
You can tell the age of a fish from the number of growth rings on each of its scales. Each pair of rings represents a year. The dark narrow rings represents winter; the wider, lighter rings represents summer.
No you can not it fish scales.
Most fish are covered with 'scales'
Fish scales do not tessellate, they overlap. Like most scales do.
yes they do all fish have scales All fish do not have scales.
Yes, trumpet fish do have scales.
Fish Scales was born in 1976.
yes they do contain fish scales as well as bettle juce