Because it has been asked and answered allready .
The direct object of the verb 'asked' is the noun question. The noun Juanita is the indirect object, 'I asked a question of Juanita about...'.
yas
The verb does not have a direct object in the sentence, "She is insecure."
Does the verb do something to or for the object? Really, a better question is if the sentence can be reworded to include a preposition.Example: Mark gave Louis the book.Louis is the indirect object because the book, the direct object/ what the verb is acting on, is being given TO him.You can rewrite it as: Mark gave the book to Louis. *Keep in mind that in this form, "Louis" is an object of a preposition, but changing the sentence helps to identify the direct object, and therefore the indirect object.
Food is the direct object. This sentence does not have an indirect object. The D.O. answers the question "the dog ate what?" An indirect object would answer the question "for whom / to whom / for what?" as in "I gave the dog a bone." I gave what? A bone (D.O.) I gave the bone to whom? The dog (I.O.)
Because it has been asked and answered allready .
The higher an object is off the ground, the more gravitational potential energy it has. This is because the object has the potential to do work due to its height above the ground.
In addition to the height of the object, the length of its shadow depends on a few other things that are not described in the question. -- Is the object standing straight upright ? -- Is the shadow cast on the ground or on sometheing else? -- If on the ground, is the ground level ? -- What is the altitude (angle) of the sun ?
Based on your question alone, it is impossible to tell how many millennia it would take for an object "like this" to be buried 300 feet in the ground. We cannot see the object to which you are referring.
An object at rest on the ground has 0 Joules of gravitational potential energy because potential energy is calculated relative to a reference point, typically a certain height above the ground. When the object is on the ground, the height is considered to be zero, so there is no potential energy stored in the object relative to that reference point.
No. Quite on the contrary: Air provides a buoyant force, that will partially counteract the force of gravity. And if the object has a low density (as in a balloon), it may even get the object from the ground.
When an object is charged by induction, electrons flow from the ground onto the object, neutralizing the charges between the ground and the object. This process redistributes the charges on the object, creating an induced charge without direct contact.
As an object falls to the ground, its potential energy decreases while its kinetic energy increases. This is because the object is converting its potential energy (due to its initial height) into kinetic energy (due to its motion). At the point of impact with the ground, all the initial potential energy is converted into kinetic energy.
You can't charge an object while holding it because you are grounding it by touching it. You ground it because a person is a conductor and they are conected to the ground, or earth.
When an object is lifted from the ground, it has potential energy because of it's position.
Subtractive - because they remove material from the object being ground.
When a charged object touches the ground, electrons can flow from the object to the ground or vice versa, depending on the net charge. This equalization of charges with the ground neutralizes the object, causing it to lose its charge.