Because it has been asked and answered allready .
The direct object of the verb 'asked' is the noun question. The noun Juanita is the indirect object, 'I asked a question of Juanita about...'.
yas
The verb does not have a direct object in the sentence, "She is insecure."
Does the verb do something to or for the object? Really, a better question is if the sentence can be reworded to include a preposition.Example: Mark gave Louis the book.Louis is the indirect object because the book, the direct object/ what the verb is acting on, is being given TO him.You can rewrite it as: Mark gave the book to Louis. *Keep in mind that in this form, "Louis" is an object of a preposition, but changing the sentence helps to identify the direct object, and therefore the indirect object.
Food is the direct object. This sentence does not have an indirect object. The D.O. answers the question "the dog ate what?" An indirect object would answer the question "for whom / to whom / for what?" as in "I gave the dog a bone." I gave what? A bone (D.O.) I gave the bone to whom? The dog (I.O.)
Because it has been asked and answered allready .
In addition to the height of the object, the length of its shadow depends on a few other things that are not described in the question. -- Is the object standing straight upright ? -- Is the shadow cast on the ground or on sometheing else? -- If on the ground, is the ground level ? -- What is the altitude (angle) of the sun ?
Based on your question alone, it is impossible to tell how many millennia it would take for an object "like this" to be buried 300 feet in the ground. We cannot see the object to which you are referring.
No. Quite on the contrary: Air provides a buoyant force, that will partially counteract the force of gravity. And if the object has a low density (as in a balloon), it may even get the object from the ground.
No. They both hit the ground at the same time, because the VERTICAL component of velocity in both cases is the same.
No. They both hit the ground at the same time. This is because the VERTICAL component of velocity in both cases is the same.
Because you're applying force the object, which unless the ground has glue or something to keep the object in place can't stop it from moving.
Grounding is the process of removing the excess charge on an object by means of the transfer of electrons between it and another object of substantial size. When a charged object is grounded, the excess charge is balanced by the transfer of electrons between the charged object and a ground. A ground is simply an object which serves as a seemingly infinite reservoir of electrons; the ground is capable of transferring electrons to or receiving electrons from a charged object in order to neutralize that object.
You can't charge an object while holding it because you are grounding it by touching it. You ground it because a person is a conductor and they are conected to the ground, or earth.
When an object is lifted from the ground, it has potential energy because of it's position.
Subtractive - because they remove material from the object being ground.
sir, the answer to your question is yes as I was curious of this question too. So I did some research and found out how to do an experiment on this. In conclusion, as the mass of an object increases, the length that the elastic band can extend to decreases. I hope this has answered your question Thanks.