Nothing dreadfully wrong with that sentence, but it does repeat itself, in that '10am' means '10 o'clock in the morning' (evening would be pm). So shorter forms would be 'Tomorrow morning at 10' or 'Tomorrow at 10am'.
You would say either "today" or "this morning"
Either and both are correct, but mean quite different things. In the most likely context, the speaker means to say that they 'shall' come tomorrow morning.Confusing 'will' and 'shall' is a common error in diction. When a speaker (or writer) uses 'will,' they are communicating their will, ie, what they want to happen. 'Shall' implies a prediction about future occurrences.For example (using past tense emphasizes this):I would (willed) have come yesterday, but the weather prevented it; so, I will come tomorrow. If the weather is pleasant, I shall come.Just remember, 'will' is what one wants to happen, or intend to do, regardless of reality or what actually transpires.I will grow feathers and fly away like a bird; but I truly doubt that I shall.Common colloquial uses that interchange 'will' and 'shall' are patently wrong.---USAGE NOTEColloquial English virtually never uses "shall" (it is practically archaic in US English). Speakers will use the contraction "I'll" which makes no distinction between will and shall. So unless you are writing a novel set in the 19th century, the point is somewhat moot.
I think the answer is "Super Economy country".Please give the correct if am wrong.
left,wrong
"That was wrong" is a grammatically correct sentence.
Some will tell you that the double negative (didn't-- nothing) is wrong, but the truth is that the sentence is correct in certain contexts. There are some languages, French for example, where the double negative is an emphatic construction and not wrong. English is always growing and changing; perhaps the double negative will be considered formally correct one day.
No, the correct version of the sentence would be: "Will you wait for me tomorrow?"
"Harshal" is a traditional Indian name that does not have a direct English translation. It is a unique name that may not have a direct equivalent in English.
In medical terms, wrong means the same thing it does in standard English. Wrong means not correct.
Its "Castor oil", correct me, if I'm wrong.
In British English, the correct spelling is fertilisers.In American English, the correct spelling is fertilizers.An example sentence is: I bought the wrong fertilisers.
The grammatically correct version in American English is "Even when you're right, you're wrong."
Are is the plural form of the present tense (indicative mood) of the verb`be' and the singular form used with you. To make it simpler to understand, if you speak or write about more than 1 thing or person, use 'are'. But if you are using the singular pronoun 'you', it requires 'are'. Wrong: Is you feeling okay? Correct: Are you feeling okay? Wrong: Airplanes is a fast way to travel. Correct: Airplanes are a fast way to travel. Wrong: He are handsome. Correct: He is handsome. Wrong: They is from The United Kingdom. Correct: They are from The United Kingdom. Wrong: English words is hard for me to spell. Correct: English words are hard for me to spell. Wrong: She are very helpful. Correct: She is very helpful.
No, the correct form is "more clearly." "Clearlier" is not a word in standard English.
Either and both are correct, but mean quite different things. In the most likely context, the speaker means to say that they 'shall' come tomorrow morning.Confusing 'will' and 'shall' is a common error in diction. When a speaker (or writer) uses 'will,' they are communicating their will, ie, what they want to happen. 'Shall' implies a prediction about future occurrences.For example (using past tense emphasizes this):I would (willed) have come yesterday, but the weather prevented it; so, I will come tomorrow. If the weather is pleasant, I shall come.Just remember, 'will' is what one wants to happen, or intend to do, regardless of reality or what actually transpires.I will grow feathers and fly away like a bird; but I truly doubt that I shall.Common colloquial uses that interchange 'will' and 'shall' are patently wrong.---USAGE NOTEColloquial English virtually never uses "shall" (it is practically archaic in US English). Speakers will use the contraction "I'll" which makes no distinction between will and shall. So unless you are writing a novel set in the 19th century, the point is somewhat moot.
A. You spelled tomorrow wrong, and B. Tomorrow is Sunday, you idiot!
Yes But, it is better to say 'Can you correct my paper, please'
No, the longest pause of English punctuations is typically represented by a period, which indicates the end of a sentence. A comma is used to create shorter pauses within a sentence to separate ideas or elements.