0
What else can I help you with?
What is a type of reasoning where conclusions are based on given facts?
additive property
You can best back up the logos in your essay with?
evidence, facts, and statistics that support your analysis.
Thorndyke's 1977 experiments on thematic thinking provided the following conclusions about the use of themes?
People remember themes not facts
What is the defintion of drawing conclusions?
Conclusions" and "inferences" are synonymous terms. That's why the definition of inferences first offered up almost fifty years ago by S.I. Hayakawa in his book Language in Thought and Action fits conclusions as well. Like inferences, conclusions are "statements about the unknown based upon the known" (p.41).
Why are facts important in persuasive essays?
They back up your points with evidence.
Inductive thinking begins with what and goes on to draw conclusions?
specific, facts, and evidence
Are induction is a form of reasoning that draws a conclusion from one or more particular facts or pieces of evidence?
Yes, induction is a form of reasoning that involves drawing general conclusions based on specific observations or evidence. It allows for the formulation of hypotheses or theories by extrapolating from particular instances to broader generalizations. While inductive reasoning can lead to plausible conclusions, it does not guarantee certainty, as conclusions derived from it may not hold true in all cases.
What is jumping to conclusions persuasive technique?
Jumping to conclusions is a persuasive technique where the speaker or writer draws a hasty conclusion without considering all the facts or evidence. It can be used to manipulate an audience by presenting information in a way that leads them to a predetermined outcome without allowing for critical thinking or analysis.
Begins with specifics facts and evidence and goes on to draw conclusions?
Inductive thinking
What type of thinking occurse when you make desissions and draw conclusions?
specifics, facts, and evidence
What is it called Using facts to infer a solution to the case?
Using facts to infer a solution to a case is often referred to as "deductive reasoning." This method involves drawing logical conclusions based on available evidence and established premises. In legal contexts, it can also be part of "evidence-based reasoning," where conclusions are derived from the analysis of facts presented during investigations or trials.
What kind of reasoning moves from general to specific facts in order to reach conclusion?
Deductive reasoning moves from general premises to specific conclusions. This type of reasoning starts with a hypothesis or theory and tests it against evidence to reach a logical conclusion.
What is the logical progression of facts or ideas called?
The logical progression of facts or ideas is called reasoning. This process involves drawing conclusions based on premises or evidence, allowing for a structured and coherent argument. Reasoning can be deductive, where conclusions follow necessarily from the premises, or inductive, where generalizations are made based on specific observations. Effective reasoning is crucial in critical thinking and problem-solving.
How can one apply the principle "if the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts" in order to ensure accurate and reliable conclusions are drawn?
One can apply the principle "if the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts" by being open to adjusting or revising their theories based on the evidence presented by the facts. This approach helps ensure that conclusions are based on accurate and reliable information, rather than trying to force the facts to fit preconceived notions. It involves being willing to adapt and modify theories in light of new evidence, ultimately leading to more sound and valid conclusions.
What is explicit evidence?
The phrase "explicit textual evidence" means that you can point to specific words that convey a point. You do not need to 'read into' a text to form your own conclusions. For example:The 1929 Financial Panic led to The Great Depression. That gives easily identifiable facts. It is explicit in the text.
What type of reasoning draws conclusions based on your beliefs rather than facts?
All reasoning depends at least in part on beliefs. What we accept as a "fact" is a matter of belief. Most people accept things as facts because the people around them believe the same things. Many of these "facts" can be readily disproved scientifically, but are still accepted as fact because there is a social, political or economic pressure to do so.The science of logic accepts this and thus examines not the factual nature of the basis of the reasoning but the coherence of the thought process which leads from the alleged facts to the conclusion.
If you conduct an experiments and draw conclusions that are based onvyour beliefs rather than the facts you are using?
If you draw conclusions based on your beliefs rather than the facts gathered from your experiment, you risk introducing bias and compromising the validity of your results. This can lead to incorrect interpretations and conclusions that do not accurately reflect the reality of the data. It is essential to remain objective and allow the evidence to guide your conclusions to ensure the integrity and reliability of your findings.
