Inductive reasoning
additive property
evidence, facts, and statistics that support your analysis.
People remember themes not facts
Conclusions" and "inferences" are synonymous terms. That's why the definition of inferences first offered up almost fifty years ago by S.I. Hayakawa in his book Language in Thought and Action fits conclusions as well. Like inferences, conclusions are "statements about the unknown based upon the known" (p.41).
They back up your points with evidence.
specific, facts, and evidence
Inductive thinking
Jumping to conclusions is a persuasive technique where the speaker or writer draws a hasty conclusion without considering all the facts or evidence. It can be used to manipulate an audience by presenting information in a way that leads them to a predetermined outcome without allowing for critical thinking or analysis.
specifics, facts, and evidence
Deductive reasoning moves from general premises to specific conclusions. This type of reasoning starts with a hypothesis or theory and tests it against evidence to reach a logical conclusion.
Using facts to infer a solution to a case is often referred to as "deductive reasoning." This method involves drawing logical conclusions based on available evidence and established premises. In legal contexts, it can also be part of "evidence-based reasoning," where conclusions are derived from the analysis of facts presented during investigations or trials.
The phrase "explicit textual evidence" means that you can point to specific words that convey a point. You do not need to 'read into' a text to form your own conclusions. For example:The 1929 Financial Panic led to The Great Depression. That gives easily identifiable facts. It is explicit in the text.
One can apply the principle "if the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts" by being open to adjusting or revising their theories based on the evidence presented by the facts. This approach helps ensure that conclusions are based on accurate and reliable information, rather than trying to force the facts to fit preconceived notions. It involves being willing to adapt and modify theories in light of new evidence, ultimately leading to more sound and valid conclusions.
this using what you know(facts obtained) and what occurs at that moment to draw conclusions on specific topic...
All reasoning depends at least in part on beliefs. What we accept as a "fact" is a matter of belief. Most people accept things as facts because the people around them believe the same things. Many of these "facts" can be readily disproved scientifically, but are still accepted as fact because there is a social, political or economic pressure to do so.The science of logic accepts this and thus examines not the factual nature of the basis of the reasoning but the coherence of the thought process which leads from the alleged facts to the conclusion.
Citing evidence when analyzing a plot is essential to support your interpretation and provide credibility to your analysis. It demonstrates that your ideas are based on facts and specific examples from the text, strengthening your argument and helping readers understand your perspective. Additionally, citing evidence allows others to examine the text themselves and potentially draw their own conclusions.
Implications refer to the potential consequences or effects of something, while inferences are conclusions or interpretations drawn based on available information. Implications are typically broader and can encompass a range of possible outcomes, while inferences are specific interpretations made based on evidence or reasoning.