answersLogoWhite

0

You don't have to face the embarassing truth. Scapegoats are particularly useful when the real culprits are the people in authority, who have power and social status. They will strongly resist being called to account for their crimes because they will lose prestige if not power. So strongly will they resist that anyone trying to call them to account will face danger in doing so. It's safer to accuse someone who has no power to fight back. Justice is seen to be done by the ignorant, and the only one who loses is the scapegoat.

An equitable solution all around unless you happen to be the scapegoat.

Scapegoats are also useful where there is actually no solution to a problem, or where the solution is beyond people's knowledge or would be very damaging to those in authority. A great plague is ravaging Europe. The science of the day has no idea how to stop it. Superstition is causing people to turn against the powerful and authoritarian church. The answer: blame the Jews. Then people will think that something is being done, will lay off the church, and will be calmer and less likely to revolt.

Again, highly equitable unless you happen to be the Jews.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

What else can I help you with?