0
What else can I help you with?
How do you spell applicant?
appellant aspirant candidate claimant hopeful inquirer petitioner, postulant, seeker, suitor, suppliant
What is the definition of stipulative?
stipulative definition is stipulative definition
What are the two types of definition?
the two types of definition are the formal and informal definition.
What is the definition of unbounded region?
definition feasible region definition feasible region
What is the definition of scissors?
What is the definition of scissors?
The respondent did not serve their answer to the summons to the petitioner. What can the petitioner do about it?
what happen's if a respondent dose not serve the petitioner a response to a summons
When divorcing on the grounds of Drug addiction could that be a problem for the petitioner?
If the petitioner has the problem
Who is a petitioner and who is the respondent?
In legal contexts, the petitioner is the party who initiates a lawsuit or brings a case before a court, seeking a specific outcome or remedy. The respondent, on the other hand, is the party who responds to the claims made by the petitioner in a legal proceeding.
WHO WAS a petitioner in greek history?
the answer for the petitioner in the "Trojan War" crossword puzzle 11, is suppliant. <3savannahd
What is the difference between a petitioner and an applicant?
If you are US citizen, you are petitioner, and the one who is coming to US is an applicant.
Petitioner violating restraining order in Florida?
If the restraining order is against the Petitioner (as in a case where there are counter-petitions), the Petitioner may be arrested by any sheriff's office.Additional: In FL, even if no counter-petition has been sought or awarded, the petitioner is bound by the same restrictions as have been placed against the respondant. As stated above, the petitioner CAN be arrested for violating the provisions their own restraining order. The petitioner cannot use their order as a weapon against the respondant.
Are there any laws in Illinois that will protect respondent when the petitioner in an order of protection contacts the respondent and petitioner also violates original divorce decree?
Question is not really worded clearly. However - the same order that prevents the respondant from contacting the petitioner also protects the respondant from being contacted by the petitioner. THey are in equal violation and can be sanctioned by the court that issued the order. The petitioner can NOT contact and harass the respondant just because the petitioner thinks they are 'protected.' However, even if the petitioner can be proven to be violating the divorce decree that is a separate issue from the protection order which will have to be handled as a contempt matter.
Who opposes the petitioner?
the respondent
What does the no fault law require?
It depends on the context definition of "no fault". No-fault divorce does not need legal grounds; it only requires the petitioner's desire to no longer be married, for whatever reason, or for no reason.
The no fault law requires what?
It depends on the context definition of "no fault". No-fault divorce does not need legal grounds; it only requires the petitioner's desire to no longer be married, for whatever reason, or for no reason.
Who is the petitioner and who is the respondant?
The Petitioner is the one that files the claim or call for action & the respondent is the one that the claim is against or the opponent.
Who was the petitioner in the Trojan War?
Menelaus.
