the petitioner is the person whoe served the papers and the respondent is the person who will response to the petitioner
If the respondent does not want to be served, it is really not up to the petitioner to locate him. What the court wants is a concerted effort in locating the respondent so that later the respondent cannot say that no effort was made. Keep a journal of your efforts to show the court. Make an entry for every phone call, every address check, every mutual friend you talk to, every possible employer you contact, etc. You can relay this information then to the court as you learn about the individual's whereabouts, but it probably will not result in the individual being served.
the plaintiff
protect, cover, guard, screen, preserve, shelter, shield
Defendant, accused, respondent.
If you don't receive a response from the petitioner after being served for 30 days, you may be able to request a default judgment in court. This means that the court may proceed with the case without input from the non-responsive party. It's important to follow legal procedures specific to your jurisdiction in such situations.
what happen's if a respondent dose not serve the petitioner a response to a summons
the respondent
In Illinois, whether a petitioner can contact the respondent depends on the specifics of the case, particularly if there is a restraining order in place. If a protective order exists, the petitioner is typically prohibited from contacting the respondent directly or indirectly. If no such order is in effect, the petitioner may contact the respondent, but it’s advisable to do so cautiously and consider the potential implications for their case. Always consult with a legal professional for guidance tailored to the situation.
The Petitioner is the one that files the claim or call for action & the respondent is the one that the claim is against or the opponent.
The person who asked the court for the divorce. The other person is Respondent.
In a legal case, a petitioner and respondent are terms used in civil cases, where the petitioner is the party bringing the case to court and the respondent is the party being sued. On the other hand, in criminal cases, the terms plaintiff and defendant are used, with the plaintiff being the prosecution bringing charges against the defendant.
The parties to a US Supreme Court case are typically referred to as the Petitioner and the Respondent. This is approximately analogous to the Plaintiff (Petitioner) and Defendant (Respondent) in a criminal case.
One can become a respondent in a divorce case when their partner files for a divorce. The one who files the divorce is the petitioner and the other partner is the respondent.
They shouldn't alternate in any one docket. However, the petitioner in one docket (e.g., child support) might be the respondent in another, related docket (e.g., visitation).
If they refuse, and does not appeal, ile a motion for a default order.
Question is not really worded clearly. However - the same order that prevents the respondant from contacting the petitioner also protects the respondant from being contacted by the petitioner. THey are in equal violation and can be sanctioned by the court that issued the order. The petitioner can NOT contact and harass the respondant just because the petitioner thinks they are 'protected.' However, even if the petitioner can be proven to be violating the divorce decree that is a separate issue from the protection order which will have to be handled as a contempt matter.
Yes. The Petitioner (or Appellant) brings his or her case against the Respondent (or Appellee). The Petitioner is the one who files a petition for a writ of certiorari.Usually, this means the Petitioner lost in the intermediate Court of Appeals, but there have been occasional instances where the winning party files first, in anticipation of the decision being challenged. This strategy is sometimes employed because the Petitioner gets to present his (or her) case first, and may reserve a portion of his allotted 30 minutes for rebuttal after the Respondent has argued. Having an opportunity to rebut the opponent's argument can present a significant advantage.