In Illinois, whether a petitioner can contact the respondent depends on the specifics of the case, particularly if there is a restraining order in place. If a protective order exists, the petitioner is typically prohibited from contacting the respondent directly or indirectly. If no such order is in effect, the petitioner may contact the respondent, but it’s advisable to do so cautiously and consider the potential implications for their case. Always consult with a legal professional for guidance tailored to the situation.
what happen's if a respondent dose not serve the petitioner a response to a summons
the respondent
In legal contexts, the petitioner is the party who initiates a lawsuit or brings a case before a court, seeking a specific outcome or remedy. The respondent, on the other hand, is the party who responds to the claims made by the petitioner in a legal proceeding.
Question is not really worded clearly. However - the same order that prevents the respondant from contacting the petitioner also protects the respondant from being contacted by the petitioner. THey are in equal violation and can be sanctioned by the court that issued the order. The petitioner can NOT contact and harass the respondant just because the petitioner thinks they are 'protected.' However, even if the petitioner can be proven to be violating the divorce decree that is a separate issue from the protection order which will have to be handled as a contempt matter.
The Petitioner is the one that files the claim or call for action & the respondent is the one that the claim is against or the opponent.
The person who asked the court for the divorce. The other person is Respondent.
In a legal case, a petitioner and respondent are terms used in civil cases, where the petitioner is the party bringing the case to court and the respondent is the party being sued. On the other hand, in criminal cases, the terms plaintiff and defendant are used, with the plaintiff being the prosecution bringing charges against the defendant.
The parties to a US Supreme Court case are typically referred to as the Petitioner and the Respondent. This is approximately analogous to the Plaintiff (Petitioner) and Defendant (Respondent) in a criminal case.
One can become a respondent in a divorce case when their partner files for a divorce. The one who files the divorce is the petitioner and the other partner is the respondent.
They shouldn't alternate in any one docket. However, the petitioner in one docket (e.g., child support) might be the respondent in another, related docket (e.g., visitation).
I would call one of those phone lines that offer free legal advice, or I would contact a lawyer and ask them
If they refuse, and does not appeal, ile a motion for a default order.