It means the same but it's written different.... JK there has to be another difference, so just try researching online "been in" and "been to" cuz I don't feel like doin that 4 u... :)
This is not necessarily correct, but I feel that been 'in' implies a much longer stay and a much greater immersion in the city. 'To' could simply mean a short visit.
E.G.
He has been in Rome for 10 years now.
He has been to Rome for a holiday.
drew is past tense and drawn is been done a week ago
difference between one- ones
What is the difference between realism and liberalism?
Difference between naatak and ekanki
what is the difference between audience and spectator
there is no differece
There is no difference.
There is never a time difference between Italy and Spain.
Rome, Italy is 1 hour ahead of Ireland
1 Hour
767 miles
Much the same as the difference between to and in.
ancient Rome hated christians, modern rome embraces them
Time and culture are the difference between ancient Rome and present day Rome. The ancients were pagan and lived in the pagan culture, with it's values and outlooks. The modern Roman is mostly Christian and lives according to Christian values and outlooks.
nothing
9 hours.
The major religion in India is Hinduism, while in Rome is Christianity