answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Firstly capital punishment or the death penalty should be banned therefore eliminating the death of those presumed 'innocent'. Further and extensive research of evidence and witnesses should be conducted. Those who are pleading guilty should not give up hope. Believe that police and investigators will find more evidence supporting the assumed and presumed innocent.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What should be done to keep the innocent from being accused and presumed guilty?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What was popularized in the us by William Blackstone?

Those accused of crimes should be considered innocent until proven guilty.


Who popularized that idea that people accused of crimes should be considered innocent until proven guilty?

William Blackstone


Who popularized the idea that people accused of crimes should be considered innocent until proven guilty?

William Blackstone


What ideas was popularized in the US by William Blackstone?

Those accused of crimes should be considered innocent until proven guilty.


Which individual popularized the idea that people accused of crimes should be considered innocent until proven guilty?

William Blackstone


Should a person be accused of a crime even though he or she is not yet proven guilty or innocent?

People should be accused of crimes if there is some substantial evidence that they have committed them. You do not have to be proven guilty in order to be accused, because if a person is not accused, there won't be a trial, and there will therefore be no opportunity to prove either guilt or innocence in a legal sense.


Which idea was popularized by William Blackstone in the US?

Those accused of crimes should be considered innocent until proven guilty- apex


What legal term reflects the belief that the accused is innocent until proven guilty and that he or she should not suffer hardship while awaiting trial?

The accused has the "presumption of innocence," but I'm not familiar with any requirement that they be free of hardship while defending themselves.


Should your legal system allow lawyers to defend people accused of committing severe or unpopular crimes?

Yes. The key word of your question is ACCUSED. Until a person is found guilty, they are innocent. Can you think of anyone that needs a lawyer more?


What is the relationship between the police power and due process of law?

IMO, police power is the authority of a police officer to arrest an individual suspected of a crime. On the other hand, due process of law protects the right of the accused; that is, a suspect is presumed innocent until proven guilty. Thus, the authority should not trample a suspect's bill of rights when discharging its police power.


What ensures that the Canadian justice system is fair?

Well it should be the law, as one should be innocent until proven guilty! But in todays world it seems a man is guilty until proven innocent as they sit in jail.


Why are you treated guilty until proven innocent?

You are not innocent until proven guilty but rather presumed innocent. In a legal sense this means that the it is encumbent upon the prosecution to prove your guilt and not encumbent upon you to prove your innocence. The arrest is made because there is a reasonable presumption of guilt but you are only sent to jail if the court is convinced you pose a flight risk. These matters seem to contradict a presumption of innocence but a declaration of freedom for all followed by the creation of a government to ensure justice is a contradiction as well. It is why the people have come together to form a more perfect union rather than a perfect union.