William Blackstone
William Blackstone
Those accused of crimes should be considered innocent until proven guilty.
William Blackstone
Those accused of crimes should be considered innocent until proven guilty.
Those accused of crimes should be considered innocent until proven guilty- apex
(in the US) Absolutely. Under our system of justice the accused is considered innocent until PROVEN guilty.
A jury or court finds that the accused is not guilty, in reality the accused may not innocent.
Anyone accused including yourself is innocent until proven guilty. People have a right to bail, to a certain extent that is. The right to bail is also contained in the Constitution.
The defendant is not guilty of the crime they are accused of.
That is known as a "Deadlocked" or a "Hung Jury." The judge will usually reiterate his instructions to the jury - instruct them in the applicable portions of the law - and send them back to deliberate further. In the final analysis if the jury remains deadlocked a "mis-trial" will be declared. And a new trial will be scheduled.
It is estimated that around 200 people were accused of witchcraft during the Salem witch trials, with 20 individuals being executed. This means that about 90% of those accused were innocent of the crimes they were charged with.
Mostly innocent women.