This goes back to the Dark and Middle Ages in Europe when law and order were not well established. Barons were a lower grade of noblemen who did not always have land. Some of them built strongholds (castles or fortified houses) at strategic places in remote areas and kept a lookout for wealthy looking travellers or merchants. If the travellers did not have their own escort of armed guards or if the barons thought they and their men had a chance of overcoming any guards, they then attacked the travellers and robbed them. Some of these robber barons became very rich, not because they produced anything but because they stole it. The term is generally used today to describe businesses (or their managers) that use strength to force smaller businesses to give up their assets. A similar modern term is "asset stripping": buy up a company, thus acquiring the rights to good products, brand names or patents, then sell off the company, which can no longer survive on its own.
It is from the game of cricket. The wicket is the playing field. If you have a sticky wicket, it is muddy or soggy, and hard to play on. The term has since come to mean any sort of difficult situation.
Where I come from in southeast England gear can mean either clothes (that's some great new gear you've got on there) or marijuana.
The triple threat is a basketball stance where you make any of three moves instead of just one. The term has come to mean anything that is massively powerful in a situation, such as an employee who can do many different jobs or a company that controls several different areas of business.
what does the term "other hearing" mean in the court of law
a old lady
Robber barons were important because their terrible actions led to improvements. The union movement came about because of the way robber barons treated workers. This led to a better life for workers.
Leaders of big business
No one "invented " robber barons because it was a term used to describe people like Rockefeller. They were the riches men and lived like kings.
Robber barons
robber barons good luck on study island :)
The term "robber barons" refers to unscrupulous wealthy industrialists and business leaders in the late 19th century United States who amassed significant fortunes through exploitative practices. They often engaged in monopolistic tactics, unfair labor practices, and corruption to eliminate competition and maximize profits. While they contributed to economic growth and industrialization, their actions frequently led to social inequality and public outcry, as they prioritized profit over ethical considerations.
Robber Barons were wealthy businessmen who were known to use harsh practices to gain their wealth. They often used child or cheap labor, did not adhere to safety regulations and worked their employees long hours in order to keep production high.
In the late 19th and early 20th century was the time of industrialization. These time were good and Bad there could be a debate between either companies owners were robber barons. Or captains of Industrialization. The industrialization of the late 19th and 20th century were robber barons because they Would make workers work for very long hours and very low wages. They organized the holding company And they went against the unions. The reason the late 19th century and the early 20th century were full of robber barons because they had workers for very low wages and discriminated against sex and age. Back in that time they had sweat were all of the kids and the women worked. Even though we had sweat shops the industrialization were robber barons. In the years of 1875-1900, the wages for the women and children's were lower then the wage of of the inflation. Employers hired women because they worked for low wages and long hours they know that they would not quit because were else would they go. And children to for the same reason. The second reason that industrialists was because they were the ones who organized the holding company. This holding company did not make anything of there own. In fact they owns other companies that make the produces the goods and gain money from what those companies make. This made other companies to join each others companies so they could make big companies. Which led to the rich people even get more rich. The last season the 19th and the 20th century were full of robber barons and the robber barons made unions. The union would make the workers that were basically the parts that were the same industry. but that led into boycotts from the workers. But the robber barons did not want put up with this. They made and called it the blacklist. It was a list of all the people that were bad so no company would ever hire them. The 19th and the 20th century were full of produced goods and bads goods it all summed it up with the term of the robber barons. Robber barons would now hire workers that were yound and would pay minimum wage, and used the holding company and went against unions.
The term "robber baron" typically refers to unscrupulous industrialists or monopolists in the late 19th century who amassed great wealth through exploitative practices. While some figures like John D. Rockefeller and Andrew Carnegie are often labeled as robber barons, others, such as Thomas Edison, focused on innovation and technology that contributed positively to society. Therefore, not every wealthy industrialist of the era can be classified as a robber baron, as their methods and impacts varied significantly.
The term "robber barons" refers to wealthy industrialists in the late 19th century who amassed fortunes through exploitative practices in industries like railroads and oil. While they played a significant role in the rapid industrialization and economic growth of the United States, their methods often involved unethical practices, labor exploitation, and monopolistic behaviors. Thus, while they contributed to building America's infrastructure and economy, their legacy is complex and controversial, highlighting the tension between economic progress and social responsibility.
The English term for "nanakawan" is "robber" or "thief."
Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller were labeled "robber barons" due to their ruthless business practices and monopolistic control over their respective industries—steel and oil. They often used exploitative tactics, such as undercutting competitors, manipulating labor conditions, and engaging in unethical dealings to amass vast fortunes. This term reflects the perception that they prioritized personal wealth over fair competition and the welfare of workers, leading to significant economic disparity during the Gilded Age.