The proper use of this phrase is "acceptable to you." This is because acceptance is something that is given, and the preposition "with" infers something that is shared rather than given to another person, such as "you."
The correct answer is: okay with you THERE JACKASS
Usually, it is said as "Is it acceptable to you" instead.
But "to" can be replaced by "for" too.
But "acceptable with you" is incorrect.
Either is acceptable.
Yes, it is an acceptable contraction for "must not."
That is the correct spelling of the adverb "satisfactorily" (in an acceptable manner).
Either form is acceptable.
That is the correct spelling, although 'hifalutin' is also an acceptable spelling.
Of the two, the first.
"Did was" is incorrect; the correct phrase is "did is" when referring to a present action connected to the past. For example, "I did eat breakfast, and I am still full" correctly connects the past action of eating breakfast with the present feeling of being full.
Either is acceptable.
Yes, it is an acceptable contraction for "must not."
Both are acceptable
The correct spelling is satisfactory (acceptable, suitable).
No, "lighted" is typically used as the past tense of "light." However, "lit" is more commonly used in modern English.
Correct, accurate to an acceptable degree.
No. It is informal shorthand, not acceptable in formal writing.
That is the correct spelling of the adverb "satisfactorily" (in an acceptable manner).
The sentence is acceptable.
In terms of grammar, it's acceptable.