It depends what sentence you are using it in. If it is future tense, then it will be run. If it is past tense, then it will be ran.
It is "need to be run" but I'd use a simpler phrase myself ...
In the world of technology, where a script is a snippet or more of computer code, the proper grammar is: The script was run, or the script ran.
No. It should be either "You have run a marathon" or "You ran a marathon".
You could have run longer.The reason is:"Ran" is the simple past tense: "Yesterday I ran all the way home.""Run" is the past participle: "You should have run." "The race has been run."
The word is spelled run, just as you spelled it. I ran. You ran. He/she/it ran. I run. You run.
a dog ran quickly
"Is run" is correct. "Is ran" is not grammatically correct.
"Will be run": the verb "run" is its own past participle.
Will be run
Had run is correct.
The correct phrase is "you have run." "Run" is the past participle form of the verb "to run" when used in perfect tenses with the auxiliary verb "have."
"The process will be run" is correct.
No, ran.
The proper grammar is "report was run."
Have run is the correct present perfect tense. Perfect tenses are created with past participles, and the past participle of run is run.
In the world of technology, where a script is a snippet or more of computer code, the proper grammar is: The script was run, or the script ran.
No, the correct past-tense form of run is ran. "Runed" is not a valid past tense form for this verb.
The correct English grammar would be 'I should have run'.