Munsif which has originated from ARABIC Language and now is a part of URDU Language. The courts at the district levels are known as subordinate courts. The people who decide matters of civil cases in subordinate courts are known as munsifs. They do not wear the black uniform.
In law, the resolution of a dispute outside of the mechanism of the courts.
It's the plural word for short.
Many people work in courts. There are different typists, recorders, ushers, lawyers, and judges.
women who engaged in extramarital affairs; they might be subject to prosecution in church courts or to a variety of traditional shaming rituals that made their transgressions public. Women of 'light carriage' could be publicly whipped and dragged through the streets on wooden carts or skimmingtons. The humiliating spectacle of the punishment was considered important as a deterrent of repeat offenses and as a cautionary lesson to others.
Territorial Courts
Bill of Rights by Supreme Court
No courts are similar to district courts. That is, each state has its own court system. Some states have lower courts called district courts, and some states have higher courts called district courts. In the federal court system, the lowest court is the U. S. District Court. Want's Publishing Company has a publication showing the breakdown of the court system in each state. Most law libraries have a copy of this publication that comes out annually. I just finished a quiz on this exact question. And Territorial courts are similar in function, jurisdiction, and operation. That's from US Government Democracy In Action book(pg.315)
all the court systems are interlinked, but the state courts make their own decision without input from federal courts
cases
Federal courts (and most/all state courts) are non-partisan, meaning there are no parties.
The Lau v. Nichols case is an example of the courts interpreting the meaning of federal laws.
Not without the courts involved.
Congress established the lower federal courts
NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The courts interpret a law when the meaning, application, or constitutionality of a law is part of a case before the court. Appellate courts are more likely to be called upon to interpret laws than trial courts.
In the US, the courts cannot choose to break the law, so if there's a law against it, then no, they can't.