It depends on what you are looking to do with the shoe
Nike shoes are better for comfort,cushioning and support! they give better instep support and better cushioning than most shoes! They use air cushioning systems such as zoom air and nike air which prove best for shock absorption and bounce!!!!
Each has its own good...
Puma is better for those who need cheap shoes at outstanding quality as Puma is a bit cheaper than Nike!
Puma sells an assortment of athletic clothing and accessories.
Adidas is better than puma because adidas has more confort in the shoes
Puma is comfortable for some people. They both cost alot. In my opinion it is worthless to buy both. If you wish to buy then get adias they are the best. They are both good but with todays style which we shouldnt care about then get adidas it is most popluar!
Puma has never put anything other on its shoes than a jumping puma. Apart from that, the brand is widely sold in Islamic countries, so Puma would not even consider putting anything offensive on their shoes or in their adverts.
Less than 2 pounds per shoe.
It means that papers are better than shoes so it is better to wear out your shoes than your paper
Running shoes are better than walking shoes in terms of skip proof. If not, it will be rather dangerous for wearer.
yes
The reason why they are better than most shoes is because Mizuno is an upper end brand of running shoes and they have better support. But you always want the shoes that feel the best.
yes ofcourse........
no a serval can leap farther than a puma
no a puma can't jump higher than a serval