Seconds can be divided into much smaller units. A millisecond is 1/1000 of a second, a microsecond is 1/1,000,000 of a second, a nanosecond is 1/1,000,000,000 of a second...
One of the smallest time scales defined by scientists is Planck time, defined a 10-44 seconds. That means if you divided a second up into
100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000
parts, one of those parts is the Plank time.
A moment in time would normally be longer than a second, therefor a second would be faster.
Yes, 60 frames per second is faster than 50 framer per second.
Light is faster than sound. Light travels through empty space at a speed of about 186,282 miles per second (299,792 kilometers per second), whereas sound travels through air at about 1,125 feet per second (343 meters per second).
no. micro second is less than milli second.
nothing as i see
100 Mbps is faster by a factor of about 250.
3g is faster than 1.0mbps, as long as you mean megabit per second.
A nanosecond is shorter than a millisecond
faster than you think
A nanosecond is one billionth of a second, while a microsecond is one millionth of a second. Therefore, a nanosecond is 1,000 times faster than a microsecond.
No, an echo is not faster than light. Light travels at the fastest speed possible in the universe, which is approximately 299,792 kilometers per second in a vacuum. Sound, including echoes, travels much slower than light, at about 343 meters per second in air.
No, sound is not faster than eyesight. Light travels faster than sound, with light moving at approximately 299,792 kilometers per second in a vacuum, compared to sound traveling at 343 meters per second in the air at room temperature.