Yes they do, but only if they aren't representing america as they should, or if they are corrupt. This is stated in the bill of rights, literally next to where it says we can all own guns to fight back against a corrupt government. If you were to do this, get alot of followers, like half of america
US citizens have the authority to vote in elections, and to respect the outcome of the election, which makes violent revolution unnecessary. And if you feel that a violent revolution would be fun, check out the fun currently taking place in Syria (in 2013). Actually, the US death toll could be tremendously higher. The US is much more heavily armed than Syria (or than anybody).
I should add that nowhere in the Bill of Rights does it say that we can all own guns to fight back against a corrupt government. It says that we can all own guns in order to participate in a well regulated militia. The purpose of a well regulated militia is to defend the country from foreign enemies, not to overthrow the government.
legitimacy
Yes, Roman law was based on the principle of the rights of citizens.
The government is over reaching its authority by trying to do away with some things in the constitution. Some of the freedoms given there are not always being allowed by the government. They are stepping over the authority given to them when they do this.
no
Roman law was based on the principle of rights, the rights of citizens.
If there are disputes over authority between local, state, or the national government, how are the disputes resolved?
the citizens are not supposed to have control over their government because if the government didn't have power over the people, how would the government be making the big economic decisions without the reference of the people?
A government that maintains complete control over its citizens is often referred to as an authoritarian regime or totalitarian state. In such systems, the government exerts extensive authority over various aspects of life, including political, social, and economic activities. Citizens typically have limited personal freedoms, and dissent is often suppressed through censorship, surveillance, and coercion. This concentration of power can lead to the erosion of democratic processes and human rights.
The state is the sole source of the right to resort to the use of legitimate force to compel obedience from citizens. The government is a complex of institutions of the state but is not itself the source of authority. Rather, government institutions exercise the state authority. Taken from TRU Poli 200 Handbook.
Which would describe a system where a dictator hold authority over nearly every part of life?
government.
Airstrip One in the novel "1984" symbolizes the oppressive control and surveillance of the government over its citizens. It represents a dystopian society where individual freedom is restricted, and the government exercises complete authority over every aspect of people's lives.