You could try to limit the amount of time/contact your ex-spouse has with your child (possibly easier if you move away) and consciously counteract their demeaning/demanding/damaging involvement in the child's life by being the supportive, understanding, mature parent who attempts to be a counterbalance. This is terribly hard if you are also trying not to set up conflicts of loyalty for your child between the two of you as parents. i have a now grown up son who has suffered from this situation and I can't honestly claim that I sorted out the dilemma for him - i think whatever my attempts at reinforcement he has been undermined by his father's scathing scorn mixed with bribery, though he is himself a lovely kind human being, intelligent and talented. I am afraid his confidence is still dented by the relationship.
they should by no junk food and keep them energized
Yes. That would be a parent's prerogative.
Yes, a parent CONVICTED of sexual offenses can still keep their children although it would probably be under the close supervision of the Department of Children and Family Services (or equivelant agency).
The non-custodial parent can go to court and request custody of the children. A judge will decide which parent should be awarded custody of the children. The circumstances under which the children are currently living, combined with the reason(s) they are not living with you will be a big factor in whether or not you get to keep custody of the children.
No, that would be criminal fraud.A parent has a right to have access to their children, unless it is proven that that parent is dangerous to the health and safety of the child.
He came to look in your mirror.
If your ex has custody than yes. If not than the other parent has every right.
Not if you have court ordered visitation rights or shared custody.
In short, no. Consult an attorney.
Yes, depending on the circumstances.Yes, depending on the circumstances.Yes, depending on the circumstances.Yes, depending on the circumstances.
Yes and no. If the biological parent is proven unfit to care for they're children then the step parent has the right to APPLY for custody of his/her step children. Keep in mind that being married to the biological parent doesn't automatically make them the parent of the children nor does it make them they're legal guardian so there are no guarantees that the step parent will be given custody. If the children are happy with the step parent and no one in the biological parents family protest the application and the step parent is proven fit to care for the child(ren) then most usually the courts will award the step parent custody.
The short answer is "you cant" - the narcissist has the REAL problem and the CONTROL. They are incapable of being fair and will do what they want to do. They are emotionally imbalanced and have a serious confusion between love and hatred. Why leave possessions to someone you hate, that's the confusion of the narcissistic parent. If you are already the golden child, there is a strong chance, but there are still no guarantees. My thoughts are 'Don't prostitute yourself for a chance of a dip in the inheritance - it really is not worth it!'. I recall someone once saying 'Only the good die young' and so the narcissist will be around for a very long time - is it worth it? You'll be old by the time any inheritance matures!! Not only that do you want to pay for the narcissist to stay at the very expensive elderly homes - if the answer is no! Let them stew in their own juices and keep away!!!!!!!!!