answersLogoWhite

0

Professor Schroeder argues that children have an innate concept of justice that enables them to make distinctions between fair and unfair rules. This argument is most consistent with the views of:

Plato IS the answer. Socrates is NOT the answer.

Trust me I just took a test on this and my answer was correct.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What was the nature of the argument between Einstein and his professor regarding the existence of God?

Albert Einstein and his professor had a disagreement about the existence of God. Einstein believed in a higher power that created the universe, while his professor argued that there was no scientific evidence to support the existence of God. Their argument centered around the philosophical and scientific implications of the concept of a higher power.


How does the author respond to the counter argument that vegans give animals rights that they shouldn't have?

by quoting information from a professor of bioethics at princeton -apex


What is a contrasting point?

A contrasting point is a statement or argument that highlights differences, contradictions, or opposing viewpoints between two or more things being discussed. It serves to emphasize distinctions and provide a balanced perspective on a topic.


Give you a sentence for the work rhetorical?

I answered the professor's question despite the fact that it was rhetorical.


What argument has the word moreover in it?

"Studying regularly is important for academic success. Moreover, consistent practice enhances understanding and retention of material, leading to better performance in exams."


When a key term in an argument is ambiguous and the meaning of the term changes during the course of the argument occurs?

This is known as equivocation, where a term is used with multiple meanings, leading to a logical fallacy. It can create confusion or misrepresent the argument by changing the meaning of the term within the discussion. Clarity in definitions and consistent use of terms can help prevent equivocation in arguments.


Read the following argument Studies have found that children who study music learn to read more easily than students who do not have this opportunity. Which of the following statements offers the most?

Music reading requires a left-to-right orientation and sensitivity to auditory distinctions just as reading does.


Evidence proving valid and sound argument is important?

Valid and sound arguments are essential for logical reasoning and critical thinking. Validity ensures the logical structure of an argument is consistent, while soundness additionally requires that the premises are true. Evidence helps establish the truth of premises, increasing the credibility and strength of an argument. Without evidence, arguments may lack support and fail to persuade others.


What does counter argument mean?

A counter argument is an argument made against another argument.


What is the rhetorical term for PREMISE of argument?

A course of reasoning aimed at demonstrating truth or falsehood. Argument is one of the traditionalmodes of discourse. Adjective: argumentative.Daniel J. O'Keefe, a professor of communication and persuasion theory, has distinguished two senses of argument. Put simply, "Argument1, the first sense, is a thing people make, as when an editorialist argues that some public policy is wrong. Argument2 is a kind of interaction people have, as when two friends argue aboutwhere to have lunch.(For the specialized use of this term in language studies, see Argument [Linguistics].)So argument1 comes close to the ancient rhetorical notion of argument, while argument2legitimates the modern interactional research"(quoted by Dale Hample in "A Third Perspective on Argument." Philosophy and Rhetoric, 1985).


What is the purpose of logical argument?

ar·gu·ment, A course of reasoning aimed at demonstrating truth or falsehood: log·i·cal Reasoning or capable of reasoning in a clear and consistent manner. logical argument- a course of reasoning aimed at demonstrating a truth or falsehood; the methodical process of logical reasoning; Thesaurus.By it's definition, it's to separate truth from falsehood or fiction.


What is the use of passing an argument by value?

Passing an argument by value means that the method that receives the argument can not change the value of the argument. Passing an argument by reference means that the method that receives the argument can change the value of the incoming argument, and the argument may be changed in the orignal calling method.