Professor Schroeder argues that children have an innate concept of justice that enables them to make distinctions between fair and unfair rules. This argument is most consistent with the views of:
Plato IS the answer. Socrates is NOT the answer.
Trust me I just took a test on this and my answer was correct.
Albert Einstein and his professor had a disagreement about the existence of God. Einstein believed in a higher power that created the universe, while his professor argued that there was no scientific evidence to support the existence of God. Their argument centered around the philosophical and scientific implications of the concept of a higher power.
by quoting information from a professor of bioethics at princeton -apex
A contrasting point is a statement or argument that highlights differences, contradictions, or opposing viewpoints between two or more things being discussed. It serves to emphasize distinctions and provide a balanced perspective on a topic.
I answered the professor's question despite the fact that it was rhetorical.
"Studying regularly is important for academic success. Moreover, consistent practice enhances understanding and retention of material, leading to better performance in exams."
This is known as equivocation, where a term is used with multiple meanings, leading to a logical fallacy. It can create confusion or misrepresent the argument by changing the meaning of the term within the discussion. Clarity in definitions and consistent use of terms can help prevent equivocation in arguments.
Music reading requires a left-to-right orientation and sensitivity to auditory distinctions just as reading does.
Valid and sound arguments are essential for logical reasoning and critical thinking. Validity ensures the logical structure of an argument is consistent, while soundness additionally requires that the premises are true. Evidence helps establish the truth of premises, increasing the credibility and strength of an argument. Without evidence, arguments may lack support and fail to persuade others.
A counter argument is an argument made against another argument.
A course of reasoning aimed at demonstrating truth or falsehood. Argument is one of the traditionalmodes of discourse. Adjective: argumentative.Daniel J. O'Keefe, a professor of communication and persuasion theory, has distinguished two senses of argument. Put simply, "Argument1, the first sense, is a thing people make, as when an editorialist argues that some public policy is wrong. Argument2 is a kind of interaction people have, as when two friends argue aboutwhere to have lunch.(For the specialized use of this term in language studies, see Argument [Linguistics].)So argument1 comes close to the ancient rhetorical notion of argument, while argument2legitimates the modern interactional research"(quoted by Dale Hample in "A Third Perspective on Argument." Philosophy and Rhetoric, 1985).
ar·gu·ment, A course of reasoning aimed at demonstrating truth or falsehood: log·i·cal Reasoning or capable of reasoning in a clear and consistent manner. logical argument- a course of reasoning aimed at demonstrating a truth or falsehood; the methodical process of logical reasoning; Thesaurus.By it's definition, it's to separate truth from falsehood or fiction.
Passing an argument by value means that the method that receives the argument can not change the value of the argument. Passing an argument by reference means that the method that receives the argument can change the value of the incoming argument, and the argument may be changed in the orignal calling method.