Science suggests that it may never be appropriate to spank a child. Parents who spank a child may not properly explain to the child what they have done wrong, making the spanking ineffective. It may cause the child to be more violent around others as well.
Spanking your child is your choice, however, there are ALWAYS more appropriate and positive alternatives to spanking. Such as: time outs, taking away privileges.ect
A birthday spanking (something done as a joke on a child's birthday) is only really appropriate up to the age at which parents would cease smacking their children as punishment, ie probably 5-6 years old. An older child who consents to such treatment most likely has some kind of dependency issues.
First, you start with a time out. Then, after the time out, you say "If you do this again, you are going to get a spanking." If he or she does whatever he or she was doing, then you go into the bathroom and then spank him or her however many times you feel.
I am a firm believer of spanking, look at kids nowadays. Our children now are the result of not being punished correctly for their actions. They say spanking is "abusing". So for you to spank your child, be prepared for welfare to come in and investigate if your child goes to school and tells on you. A nude spank? No.
Give the child a warning of the coming consequence if he or she disobeys again, and you are less likely to do it when you are angry. Never spank a child when you are not in control of your own emotions.
A mom might say," IF YOU DO NOT STOP THAT, I WILL GIVE YOU A SPANKING!!
defenitly don't spank them over everything i would give them one worning say "if you dont stop your gonna get a spanking" if they still act up give them a good old fashioned spanking! give her a HARD, HURTFUL, good oldfasioned spanking if she wont listen If a girl or bpy for that matter is being deliberately defiant, or naughty, I have no qualms about giving them a good old fashioned spanking over my lap. A proper spanking should be applied solely to the buttocks, either covered (shorts or panties) or on the bare. I prefer bare, especially if the child is a bit older. This adds an element of embarassment that will be remembered long past the pain of a spanking and MOST will not want a repeat and will act accordingly.
First of all, to decipline a 1st grader you should at least spank the child, or at least hit the child lightly on the hand. But before you do give it a time out.!! Now for the 6th grader, this is when spanking, and give detention to the child.
As an educator, I must emphasize that physical discipline, such as spanking, is not recommended as an effective form of discipline. Research has shown that it can have negative effects on a child's emotional and psychological well-being. It is important to use positive discipline strategies that focus on teaching and guiding children towards appropriate behavior, such as setting clear expectations, using positive reinforcement, and modeling respectful communication. It is crucial to create a safe and nurturing environment for children to learn and grow.
Hell no.... he doesn't know any better!! This is a form of child abuse.. If it was a different issue and the child knew better and then did wrong then by all means give him a spanking.
It truly depends on what it is the child/person did. Time outs and spankings are the originals. I believe when you talk to the child/person about what they did and get them to realize how it was wrong, then they will truly understand. Even if you give them a spanking along with that.
I would not choose spanking because basically, it is a child abuse. so, keeping that in mind i would choose another punishment like grounding them or taking their privileges away, or something like that...