true
Both are correct. "There can be only one" is the slogan of Highlander. "There can be only one" focuses on the singularity of the one. "There only can be one" focuses on the fact of oneness. However, this interpretation can mean that there can be at most one, or it might mean that there is only exactly one, not more or less.
Metaphors can be found throughout Old Major's speech in George Orwell's "Animal Farm." Some examples include "Man is the only real enemy we have" and "All men are enemies." These metaphors are used to compare the humans to an adversary that must be overcome.
If your teacher tells you the correct interpretation for a symbol, that is the correct interpretation in her class. A different teacher can tell you a different a different interpretation. Your first task is to pass the class. Now when you leave school, symbols can mean different things to different people. Some people will see a particular symbol and have loving feelings while other people have negative feelings. In the United States some people see a Confederate Flag and think of the brave men who knew their cause was lost and fought bravely on. Others look at it and think of the people held in slavery. It is a symbol last used for any other purpose for over 150 years.
Either one is correct
Literature is by no means only dependent on feelings and not facts. Literature incorporates feelings and facts. It is an abstraction of reality; that is, literature represents the world through a lens. What separates different types of literature is the level of abstraction present in the lens.
As far as we know, only humans have literature. But the cetaceans appear to have language, and for all we know whales and porpoises may have an "oral" literature that they compile.
Because he was a fundamentalist Christian. Such people exist today, they think their interpretation of the bible is the only one that is correct. They are too foolish to realise that there are many interpretations possible and all of them are wrong.
One can only answer that for oneself.
Keeping in mind that literature and grammer often have only a fleeting relationship, it is safe to say that a grammar lesson would not derail a literature lesson, but would serve only to punctuate the difference between how things ought to be said, and how they are normally said so that people can understand them. This is called artistic licence.
Ravens
Shakespeare:-)
it would be narrow because they only veto un constitutional laws