0
An advocate of judicial restraint would support a narrow interpretation or a broad interpretation?
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
it would be narrow because they only veto un constitutional laws
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Do you think an advocate of judicial restraint would support a narrow interpretation of the constitution or a broad interpretation?
An advocate of judicial restrain would support a narrow interpretation of the Constitution, one that adhered closely to the language of the document and his or her belief about the Framers' original intent. Interpretive ideologies such as textualism, "strict constructionism," and originalism are most often associated with judicial restraint. Contextualism, which attempts to infer intent from content, may also result in judicial restraint; however, the degree of subjectivity implicit in this method can also lend itself to judicial activism.
Supreme Court justices who support judicial activism and those who support judicial restraint most disagree on the answer to which question?
How important is the original intent of the Constitution when deciding cases? -Apex
How did the federalists and the democratic-republicans differ from each other?
Federalists, like Alexander Hamilton wanted to support England, wanted a strong powerful government, a national bank and a loose interpretation of the Coast. On the other hand, Democratic-Republicans disagreed. They wanted to support France, wanted a small federal government, no national bank and a strict interpretation of the Coast.
Which interpretation might this excerpt support?
Answer this question… Europeans thought the Japanese were superior to the Chinese.
Who serves in the Judicial Branch of US government?
Members of the Judicial Branch work in federal courthouses across the United States and its territories. The Supreme Court of the United States, head of the Judicial Branch, is housed in the Supreme Court Building in Washington, DC.
Do you think an advocate of judicial restraint would support a narrow interpretation of the constitution or a broad interpretation?
An advocate of judicial restrain would support a narrow interpretation of the Constitution, one that adhered closely to the language of the document and his or her belief about the Framers' original intent. Interpretive ideologies such as textualism, "strict constructionism," and originalism are most often associated with judicial restraint. Contextualism, which attempts to infer intent from content, may also result in judicial restraint; however, the degree of subjectivity implicit in this method can also lend itself to judicial activism.
Supreme Court justice who support judicial activism and those who support judicial restraint most disagree on the answer to which question?
A : To what extent should the supreme court work to promote social progress ?
What is to advocate?
to support
Supreme Court justices who support judicial activism and those who support judicial restraint most disagree on the answer to which question?
How important is the original intent of the Constitution when deciding cases? -Apex
What is the prefix and prefix meaning of advocate?
One who pleads the cause of another. Specifically: One who pleads the cause of another before a tribunal or judicial court; a counselor., One who defends, vindicates, or espouses any cause by argument; a pleader; as, an advocate of free trade, an advocate of truth., Christ, considered as an intercessor., To plead in favor of; to defend by argument, before a tribunal or the public; to support, vindicate, or recommend publicly., To act as advocate.
What is the synonym for backing?
support, advocate, assist, boost
What federalist essay did Alexander Hamilton argue in support of judicial review?
In Federalist Paper no. 78, Hamilton argues in support of judicial review.
Why should you support judicial review?
People support the judicial review system because ideally, it can balance and check the executive and legislative branches of government.
What is the root word for advocate?
Ad: Support Vocate: Publicly
How can you collect all your child support?
Visit the court that has jurisdiction over your case and ask to speak with an advocate from your state Child Support Enforcement. You should also file a motion for contempt of a court order against the obligor. The advocate can assist you.Visit the court that has jurisdiction over your case and ask to speak with an advocate from your state Child Support Enforcement. You should also file a motion for contempt of a court order against the obligor. The advocate can assist you.Visit the court that has jurisdiction over your case and ask to speak with an advocate from your state Child Support Enforcement. You should also file a motion for contempt of a court order against the obligor. The advocate can assist you.Visit the court that has jurisdiction over your case and ask to speak with an advocate from your state Child Support Enforcement. You should also file a motion for contempt of a court order against the obligor. The advocate can assist you.
Why do people support the judicial review?
The reason people support judicial review is that it is essential in the checks and balances system. Judicial review allows for bills for be reviewed and perhaps overturned. It limits power in order to balance out the bicameral legislature.
What has generally been the supreme courts attitude toward prior restraint?
Supreme Court decisions over the past 75 years clearly support the presumption of the unconstitutionality of prior restraint
