answersLogoWhite

0

it would be narrow because they only veto un constitutional laws

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about American Government

Do you think an advocate of judicial restraint would support a narrow interpretation of the constitution or a broad interpretation?

An advocate of judicial restrain would support a narrow interpretation of the Constitution, one that adhered closely to the language of the document and his or her belief about the Framers' original intent. Interpretive ideologies such as textualism, "strict constructionism," and originalism are most often associated with judicial restraint. Contextualism, which attempts to infer intent from content, may also result in judicial restraint; however, the degree of subjectivity implicit in this method can also lend itself to judicial activism.


Supreme Court justices who support judicial activism and those who support judicial restraint most disagree on the answer to which question?

How important is the original intent of the Constitution when deciding cases? -Apex


How did the federalists and the democratic-republicans differ from each other?

Federalists, like Alexander Hamilton wanted to support England, wanted a strong powerful government, a national bank and a loose interpretation of the Coast. On the other hand, Democratic-Republicans disagreed. They wanted to support France, wanted a small federal government, no national bank and a strict interpretation of the Coast.


Which interpretation might this excerpt support?

Answer this question… Europeans thought the Japanese were superior to the Chinese.


Who serves in the Judicial Branch of US government?

Members of the Judicial Branch work in federal courthouses across the United States and its territories. The Supreme Court of the United States, head of the Judicial Branch, is housed in the Supreme Court Building in Washington, DC.

Related Questions

Do you think an advocate of judicial restraint would support a narrow interpretation of the constitution or a broad interpretation?

An advocate of judicial restrain would support a narrow interpretation of the Constitution, one that adhered closely to the language of the document and his or her belief about the Framers' original intent. Interpretive ideologies such as textualism, "strict constructionism," and originalism are most often associated with judicial restraint. Contextualism, which attempts to infer intent from content, may also result in judicial restraint; however, the degree of subjectivity implicit in this method can also lend itself to judicial activism.


Supreme Court justice who support judicial activism and those who support judicial restraint most disagree on the answer to which question?

A : To what extent should the supreme court work to promote social progress ?


What is to advocate?

to support


Supreme Court justices who support judicial activism and those who support judicial restraint most disagree on the answer to which question?

How important is the original intent of the Constitution when deciding cases? -Apex


What is the prefix and prefix meaning of advocate?

One who pleads the cause of another. Specifically: One who pleads the cause of another before a tribunal or judicial court; a counselor., One who defends, vindicates, or espouses any cause by argument; a pleader; as, an advocate of free trade, an advocate of truth., Christ, considered as an intercessor., To plead in favor of; to defend by argument, before a tribunal or the public; to support, vindicate, or recommend publicly., To act as advocate.


How can voters check the power of the judicial branch?

Voters can check the power of the judicial branch primarily through the electoral process by voting for state and local officials who appoint or confirm judges. Additionally, they can advocate for judicial reforms, such as term limits or changes to the selection process for judges, to ensure accountability. Public awareness and participation in the legislative process can also influence judicial policies and practices. Finally, voters can support initiatives that enhance transparency and accountability in the judiciary.


When caring for a client who uses a protective device (restraint) what should the nurse aid do?

When caring for a client using a protective device (restraint), the nurse aide should ensure the device is applied correctly and comfortably, checking for any signs of discomfort or restriction of circulation. Regularly monitor the client's physical and emotional well-being, offering reassurance and support. It's essential to document the use of the restraint and the client’s response while following facility protocols and policies regarding restraints. Lastly, the aide should advocate for the client's needs and suggest alternatives to restraint whenever possible.


What federalist essay did Alexander Hamilton argue in support of judicial review?

In Federalist Paper no. 78, Hamilton argues in support of judicial review.


Why should you support judicial review?

People support the judicial review system because ideally, it can balance and check the executive and legislative branches of government.


What is the synonym for backing?

support, advocate, assist, boost


Why do people support the judicial review?

The reason people support judicial review is that it is essential in the checks and balances system. Judicial review allows for bills for be reviewed and perhaps overturned. It limits power in order to balance out the bicameral legislature.


What is the root word for advocate?

Ad: Support Vocate: Publicly