Banquo makes no promise of this kind.
I would say, Banquo had will. His will out weighed any temptations he had towards his goals. Though, just as ambitious as Macbeth, Banquo held back, happy to sit in the back seat as Macbeth explored the front row. This, truthfully would have been better in the long run (you know what they say about the tortoise and the hare) if it wasn't for Macbeth's greed and paranoia.
Fleance.
Macbeth turns them against Banquo by reminding them that they have been placed inferior in position by Banquo and that they should not let him get a way with it. Second he tells them that Banquo is a threat to himself as king and therefore should be rid of.
It's likely that either friend would have acted differently if they had been captured alongside the other. The fear of shared vulnerability could lead to more cautious behavior or a stronger drive to cooperate for mutual survival. Additionally, their bond might motivate them to strategize together, influencing their decisions under pressure. Ultimately, the presence of a companion could alter their responses to the situation significantly.
Banquo's talk with Fleance was significant for the explicit concern over the violence of nature, and the implied concern over the witches' predictions. In Act 2 Scene 1 of the Shakespearean play, Banquo met with his son in the courtyard of Macbeth's castle at Inverness. He let Fleance know of his trouble sleeping. He was plagued with a concern over the uproar in nature, and the darkness of the night and of his own thoughts. It was possible that Banquo was tempted by the power that would be his as father to a long royal line. He also might have been considering what he could do to make the Scottish crown and throne his as well as those of his descendants. In Lines 8-9, he prayed for deliverance from the 'cursed thoughts that nature/Gives way to in repose!'
Lennox notes that Malcolm and Donalbain have been accused of Duncan's murder and Fleance has been accused of Banquo's. However, he intimates that if either of them were in Macbeth's control, they would find out what it means to be murdered.
81 films acted by him according to net
In Act 3 Scene 3, Macbeth [c. 1014-August 15, 1057] plotted the death of fellow General and friend Banquo with two murderers. In Scene 3, Banquo's murder took place in the park near the royal palace at Forres. In Scene 4, the murderers showed up at the palace to give Macbeth some good news and some bad news. The good news was the successful, fatal slitting of Banquo's throat. The bad news was the escape of Fleance, Banquo's son. Banquo had been invited to the banquet in the aftermath of Macbeth's royal coronation at Scone. He didn't make good on the invite. But his ghost did. In fact, Banquo's ghost succeeded in unsettling Macbeth by taking the royal seat.
In Macbeth's mind there is no justification for killing Duncan. He didn't really want to do it ("We shall proceed no further in this business") and regrets it the moment it is done. In the case of Banquo, however, his reasoning has been blunted by his fear and paranoia ("My fears in Banquo stick deep."). His fear of Banquo is unfounded, but in Macbeth's mind it does provide a justification of sorts.
Maybe he didn't think things were going well. It might have been only you thinking that everything was just swell. If he acted like things were going well in front of you, that might have been a cover-up.
You might have cussed, acted rude or ; for se*ually conduct. ~But, If you suspect that your account has been hacked contact Parrotlady on Facebook/Sasha on FooSupport right away.
In Act 2 Scene 1 of the Shakespearean play 'Macbeth', Banquo and his son Fleance met in the court of Macbeth's castle at Inverness. Banquo explained that he had been unable to sleep. He said that 'cursed thoughts' [Line 8] were keeping him awake. Most likely, he was referring to the witches' predictions of his fathering a long line of kings of Scotland, in Act 1 Scene 2.