False. He does not want this.
Guy de Maupassant portrays Mathilde Loisel as a complex character who embodies both aspiration and discontent. While she yearns for a life of luxury and status, her obsession with appearances and material wealth ultimately leads to her downfall. Maupassant suggests that her vanity and inability to appreciate her modest life contribute to her tragic fate, highlighting the dangers of envy and the pursuit of superficial ideals. In the end, Mathilde's reality starkly contrasts with her dreams, evoking both sympathy and criticism from the reader.
Maupassant uses deliberate ambiguity in "The Necklace" by leaving the reader unsure of Mathilde's true motives and feelings, leading to tension and conflict. By keeping the value and authenticity of the necklace vague, he creates doubt and suspense around its significance. This ambiguity ultimately heightens the impact of the story's twist ending.
False Not entirely. Mme. Loisel has the good quality that she is willing to live in poverty for ten years in order to replace the necklace she lost. Nevertheless, this good quality is only brought out by her bad qualities of vanity, pride, and dishonesty.
Imagery.
He likes Paula Abdul Who is amazing unlike you the reader whois a dive
This helps your reader understand your ideas more easily.(Apex)
unreliable narrator
This helps your reader understand your ideas more easily.(Apex)
To allow the reader to easily understand the material and make important connections.
clearly stated at the end of the introduction paragraph and express the main idea or purpose of the essay. It should be focused and specific to guide the reader on what to expect in the essay.
Significance of the study, should explain clearly why is this particular research beneficial? Also it shows the reader what is important about this study
The story is open for several interpretations.. the main theme can be poverty, I believe the main theme is closely related with the title itself, since the question remains eternal of who is the real "Devil"; is it poverty, Mother Rapet, the son, the doctor, or just everyone... Is it the circumstance that the story set in, or is it the human nature... the question remains unanswered and welcomes individual understanding... perhaps Maupassant left the reader to decide upon the real devil, and hence, the main theme... the bottom line is.. It is poverty.. or simply anything a reader can "feel".