On the one hand they were, steadfastly ignoring the rising tide of unrest and clamor for more democracy. Besides, Nicholas II by his own frank admissing was totally not up to the job: he had a shy and retiring nature and even his friends would not call him very intelligent. He simply did not know how to deal with developments and was much influenced by his domineering wife who kept on telling him to hold on tight to his powers.
But the downfall itself was caused by the meltdown of Russia's war economy at the end of WW 1. Widespread famine resulted, and it was this what led to the mass demonstrations that led to revolution. And that transition again resulted from the brutal way in which the responible minister and chiefs of police dealt with the demonstrations.
The Czar - or his son - might in the end have survived as a 'ceremonial' monarch without much power, but the Communists took over from the moderate revolutionaries and that meant the final downfall of Nicholas II.
A czarina is the wife of a czar.A czarina is not necessarily married. A czarina could rule in her own right.
The definition is you are responsible for your own downfall in the future
In one sense he was - by making himself dictator for life, he presented his opponents with a final solution - end the life.
Ivan the Terrible killed his son by beating him
i meant 16th.
Another word for a Russian empress is Czarina. An empress is the wife or widow of an emperor or holds the rank of emperor in her own right and has great power and influence.
Honor plays a significant role in Julius Caesar's downfall as his unwavering belief in his own honor and loyalty blinds him to the conspirators' true intentions, leading to his assassination. His refusal to heed warnings and his overconfidence in his own honor ultimately contribute to his downfall.
You are responsible for your own grade. A responsible person does their own work.
A tragedy is someone's downfall brought on by their own good nature.
No, for if it did it would bring about its own downfall.
Yes, the concept of "revolution eats its own" suggests that movements and ideologies aiming for change and progress can end up causing their own downfall or destruction.
he was so succesful! he even ate his own feces