0
The testimony pretty much is mayella contradicting the story of Tom Robinson. Mayella was rude to Atticus and shared the similar story with her father except she kept on changing parts. Tom told his, insulted the spectators with his comment about feeling sorry for her and that's it. Of course Atticus gave his ending powerful speech that didn't sway the jury from the conviction.
What else can I help you with?
What are the flaws of Mayellas testimony?
Mayella's testimony is inconsistent with the evidence provided by other witnesses. She contradicts herself multiple times and her accusations towards Tom Robinson lack credibility. Additionally, her demeanor during the trial raises suspicions about her motives and truthfulness.
How does Scout indicate to us that Tom is telling the truth?
Scout observes Tom's demeanor in court and notices his honest and consistent testimony. Additionally, Tom's account of the events aligns with the evidence presented during the trial.
Can a judge refuse to look at evidence presented during a trial?
No, a judge cannot refuse to look at evidence presented during a trial. It is their responsibility to consider all relevant evidence in making a fair and just decision.
What information is presented in the court case that should help defen t.j is overlooked and as a result t.j is found guilty?
Evidence or witness testimony that could have cast doubt on T.J.'s guilt may have been overlooked or not presented in court. Any inconsistencies in the prosecution's case or alibi witnesses were not effectively highlighted by the defense. Additionally, important forensic evidence or expert testimony that could have supported T.J.'s innocence may not have been properly introduced during the trial.
What evidence was presented during the thestrial to support the prosecution's case?
During the trial, the prosecution presented evidence such as witness testimonies, physical evidence like DNA or fingerprints, and any relevant documents or records that supported their case against the defendant.
What is the purpose of direct and cross examinations?
Direct examination allows the attorney to present evidence and testimony that supports their case, while cross-examination allows the opposing attorney to challenge or discredit the witness's testimony and evidence presented during direct examination. Both examinations aim to help the trier of fact (judge or jury) understand the facts of the case and determine the credibility of the witnesses.
Can you be retried with new evidence presented in a case?
Yes, a person can be retried with new evidence presented in a case, as long as the new evidence was not available during the original trial and could potentially change the outcome.
Who recorded this examination testimony Is that significant?
The examination testimony was recorded by a court reporter or stenographer. It is significant because it provides a verbatim record of the testimony given during the examination, which can be used as evidence in legal proceedings.
Scout acquires an important realization during tom's testimony Discuss the realization and it's significance?
Scout realizes the injustice and racism prevalent in society when Tom Robinson is unfairly convicted despite overwhelming evidence of his innocence. This realization is significant as it marks Scout's loss of innocence and her growing awareness of the harsh realities of prejudice and discrimination in Maycomb. It sets the stage for her continued development and understanding of social issues throughout the novel.
What is the difference between evidence and testimony?
Evidence refers to any material or information that can be used to prove or disprove a fact in a legal case, such as documents, physical objects, or witness statements. Testimony specifically refers to oral statements given by witnesses under oath during a legal proceeding. Testimony is a type of evidence that is based on what witnesses personally observed or experienced.
How does a judge typically respond to an objection raised during a trial?
When an objection is raised during a trial, a judge typically listens to the objection, considers the legal basis for it, and then makes a ruling on whether to sustain (agree with) or overrule (disagree with) the objection. The judge's decision helps determine what evidence or testimony can be presented in the trial.
What does jem expect the virdict to be?
Not guilty, Jem has been following the case intently and knows the rational verdict would be guilty as there is reasonable doubt about Tom Robinson perpetrating the crime
