It wouldn't be a clause or a phrase. It's a play.
"with a sigh" is a prepositional phrase because it includes a preposition ("with") and a noun ("sigh"), but it does not have a subject and verb to form a complete thought like a clause would.
An adverbial phrase. A word, phrase, or clause of a sentence has the aspect of an adverb if it modifies a verb. By the same token, a word, phrase, or clause of a sentence that modifies a noun would be an adjective, adjectivial phrase or adjectivial clause.
To be an idependent clause a phrase would need a conjugated verb. i.e "a bushel of apples to take home" is a phrase. "I need a bushel of apples to take home" is a complete sentence.
Is he fell over a phrase a main clause or a subordinate clause
'Where they would be protected from the wind' is an adverbial clause, a group of words that contains a subject (they) and a verb (be protected) but is not a complete thought, not a complete sentence.An adverbial clause is a dependent clause that functions as an adverb; the entire clause modifies a verb, an adjective, or another adverb.
Yes. In order for it to be an independent clause there would have to be a subject that is over your head.
The subordinate clause functions as a complex clause element and is introduced by a subordinator relevant for the type of the sentence. Subordinate clause contains either a finite or non-finite verb and within its structure it is possible to detect clause elements( Subject and predication).Although a phrase (NP, PP, Adj or AdvP may function even VPs) may function as a sentence element, it does not contain a finite verb.Mary said that the meeting would be held on Wednesday.Bold= nominal that clause functioning as a direct object."the meeting"-Noun phrase(NP) functioning as a subject of the subordinate clause"on Wednesday"-prepositional phrase(PP) that functions as an adjunct of time (A) in the subordinate that clause.
The noun clause in the given sentence is "that he would use up his inheritance".This relative clause functions as an appositive (a word or phrase renaming something earlier in the sentence). This relative clause 'relates' to the noun 'worry', the subject of the sentence.
If you break this sentence apart, then you would see that Marisol was happy is an independent clause. Because her sunflower was so beautiful would be the dependent clause, I would think. Because is also a prepositional phrase beginning...
The opposite of farce is often seen as tragedy. Tragedy typically involves a serious or somber tone, dealing with themes of suffering or downfall, while farce is known for its exaggerated humor and absurd situations.
A clause contains a subject and a verb. A prepositional phrase begins with a preposition and has a noun which is the phrase's object of the prepositionPhrase: I will do my homework after dinnerClause: I will do my homework after I have dinner.the clause contains the verb "have". In this example it is a subordinate clause because it cannot be used as a sentence on its own. However because it contains a subject and a verb, some clauses called independent clauses can stand on their own.Independent Clause: I will be there at 7 pm, but don't wait for me.The bolded clause can stand on its own because it contains a subject and a verb. if you removed "but don't wait for me" you would have a simple sentence: I will be there at 7 pm.Basically a clause can be a complete thought, and contains a subject and a verb. A phrase does not contain a subject and a verb. It only contains a preposition and a noun which is the object of the preposition.
"For whom you left the message" is a prepositional phrase. A clause needs a subject and a predicate, which "for whom you left the message" lacks. It could be turned into a independent clause by messing around with the sentence to furnish one. A simple example would be, "For whom DID you leave the message? This would provide a verb and complete sentence.