Explain in your own words how you develop a behaviorally anchored rating scale. Each student should express the five steps in his or her own words. Those five steps are: 1) generate critical incidents; 2) develop performance dimensions; 3) reallocate incidents; 4) scale the incidents; and 5) develop final instrument.
A behaviorally anchored rating scale is a rating scale that is anchored with specific behavioral examples of good or poor performance. Because of the anchors, which are based on the dimensions of performance illustrated by critical incidents, a BARS combines the benefits of narratives, critical incident, and quantified scales. There are five steps required for developing a BARS. Each step is explained below.
· Step 1: Generate critical incidents. In this step, people who know the job like supervisor or job holder are asked to describe specific illustrations رسوم توضيحيةof effective and ineffective performance.
· Step 2: Develop performance dimensions. The people who know the job are then asked to cluster the incidents into a smaller set of performance dimensions and to define each dimension with a name.
· Step 3: Reallocate incidents. Another group of people, who also know the job, should reallocate the original critical incidents. They will receive the cluster definitions and the list of critical incidents. They will then reassign each incident into the cluster they think it fits best. If the assignments made by the first group and second group match well, then that critical incident is retained.
· Step 4: Scale the incidents. The second group then rates the behavior described by the incident as to how effectively or ineffectively it represents performance on the dimension.
Step 5: Develop a final instrument. Six or seven of the incidents as the dimension's behavioral anchors
Advantages:
- Ratings are not easily subjected to different interpretations of raters.
- It meets EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) guidelines for fair employment practices, since job criterion for assessment are derived form actual job performance and are related to it.
- Give easier a feed back to explain the rating to appraise it
- Can be relative reliable
Disadvantages:
- Requires observational skill and proper determination of critical behaviors; inadequacies can lead to misleading data.
- Compilation of critical behaviors takes considerable time and effort , and recording data also involve alert and constant observations (i.e. keeping logs)
- Less preferable due to similarity to trait measures
Financial constraints, price disadvantages, a lack of marketing and distribution network, and a burden from the government are all disadvantages commonly faced by small-scale industry.
The FICO score ranges from 300 to 850.
Yes. Most rating agencies use the same rating scale across different types of companies. The rating scale is designed to provide a common language for comparing creditworthiness, regardless of the type of entity or assets underlying the debt instrument or the structure of the financial obligation. This means that a 'A' rated party irrespective of whether it is a bank or a government or an automobile manufacturer carries the same level of credit risk as with other entities that have been assigned the same rating.
A credit rating estimates the credit worthiness of an individual, corporation, or even a country. It is an evaluation made by credit bureaus of a borrower's overall credit historyThe rating bands issued by the rating agencies are grouped as follows:1. Prime Investment Grade2. High Investment Grade3. Medium Grade4. Speculative/Risky5. High Risk6. In Default
Definition:A horizontal intergration occours when a firm takes over or merges with another firm in the same stage of production, Producing similar or same products .+Advantages+Achieave Greater Economies of Scale+Increase its market share+Reduction in average cost as a result of rationalization-Disadvantages-Increase in average cost -if the company is too large and experiencing dis economies of scale-The two companies maybe located some distance apart,although advances in ICT are reducing this problem.-There is initially likely to be some extra cost involved in seeking to harmonize,for instance,wage rates and accounting systems in the two companies
BARS stands for Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale.
A typical behaviorally anchored rating scale measures between five to ten specific behavioral traits or competencies. These traits are observed and rated based on the frequency and quality of the behaviors displayed by the individual being assessed.
Behaviorally anchored rating scales provide specific examples of behaviors associated with performance levels, making it easier for raters to evaluate employees objectively. They promote consistency in evaluations by defining performance criteria in behavioral terms. Additionally, they can help employees understand the expectations for their job performance more clearly.
The Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale (BARS) is a performance appraisal method that combines elements of both graphic rating scales and critical incident methods. It evaluates employee performance by using specific behavior examples as anchors to rate performance levels, providing specific and observable criteria for assessing performance. This method helps reduce rating errors and provides a more objective assessment compared to traditional rating scales.
The F-scale or Fujita scale was developed by Dr. Tetsuya Theodore Fujita as the University of Chicago in 1971. The highest rating on the scale is F5.
The Graphic Rating Scale is the simplest and most popular method for performance appraisal
both types of rubrics have a rating scale: both general and specific rubrics
The Mohs hardness scale rating for brass is around 3 to 4.
The octane rating of methanol depends on the octane rating scale measurement type used, n-Heptane is the zero point of the octane rating scale then the octane rating of methanol is 115
The scale was developed by Dr. Tetsuya Fujita at the University of Chicago in 1971. Ths highest rating is F5.
example or rating scale in measuring attitude towards mathematics
disadvantages *not to scale *there are limitations