Lets just say it would be very difficult. First Mercury is very heavy and buries itself quickly in sand/muck. Second it encapsulates around itself. Third mercury needs really to be in the gas state to be toxic. In burning in coal it cools and about 67 degrees its forming back to a solid. Its not going to float but sink to the bottom-fast. Now the tuna would be bottom feeding or plant feed would have to absorb and raise it for consumption. Now the final part is the toxin would be taken to the tunas liver where toxins are removed slowly. Mercury has a half life of six months meaning every six months half is removed till gone. Cooking raises the temperature to where mercury would vaporize and not be in the tunas liver. I have never yet found any conclusive testing with actual readings of mercury in fish. Just expert opinions.
Lets just say it would be very difficult. First mercury is very heavy and buries itself quickly in sand/muck. Second it encapsulates around itself. Third mercury needs really to be in the gas state to be toxic. In burning in coal it cools and about 67 degrees its forming back to a solid. Its not going to float but sink to the bottom-fast. Now the tuna would be bottom feeding or plant feed would have to absorb and raise it for consumption. Now the final part is the toxin would be taken to the tunas liver where toxins are removed slowly. Mercury has a half life of six months meaning every six months half is removed till gone. Cooking raises the temperature to where mercury would vaporize and not be in the tunas liver. I have never yet found any conclusive testing with actual readings of mercury in fish. Just expert opinions.
That has to be one of the dumbest answers I've ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul. Mercury gets into the water and soil as byproducts of burning coal and other fossil fuels. Algae convert it to methylmercury and fish get it from eating the algae. Bigger fish get it from eating the smaller fish that have eaten the algae.
tuna
you are not supposed to because of the mercury in the fish.
not very good for you because mercury is in tuna and can cause mercury poisoning to enter the body when eaten too much. well resent studies in 2008 show that the mercury in fish not just tuna fish has stayed the same if not decreased in the past 100 years
No. It complies with international standards for export and consumption.
Fish with high levels of mercury, like tuna and swordfish.
No. Tuna are a fish and fish do not have legs.
from a tuna fish can
You can get four tins of tuna out of one tuna fish.
predatory fish, Mercury, once ingested never leaves the body, so it is concentrated in the bodies of fish that eat other fish.
The best tuna fish sandwich idea is croissant tuna fish sandwiches. What you put on the tuna fish sandwich is tomato, lettuce, and the tuna fish. Then you put croissant as the bread.
tuna fish (twoknee fish)
Tuna fish eat other fish, squid, shellfish, and plankton. no, tuna fish do not eat seaweed. no poop