No.
The means of moving food around is infrastructure. If we were nomadic and gathered food as we went from place to place - planting food for others to consume later, that MIGHT be infrastructure, but as it exists now food would not be infrastructure.
Problem number one is food vendors are lacking capital, second policies and infrastructure are not favoring the business
Food, education, and infrastructure are often categorized as public goods. Public goods are those that are non-excludable and non-rivalrous, meaning that their consumption by one individual does not reduce availability for others, and they are typically provided or regulated by governments. Food education enhances public health and community well-being, while infrastructure, such as roads and schools, supports economic development and access to services. Together, these goods contribute to the overall quality of life and societal functioning.
Infrastructure is correct.
The prefix to "infrastructure" is "infrA-".
Public infrastructure is infrastructure that is owned by the public or is for public use. It is generally distinguishable from private or generic infrastructure in terms of policy, financing, purpose.
The negatives of living in a world composed entirely of food would be that infrastructure would be nearly impossible to achieve. This is just a fantasy concept created by fiction writers.
Transport Infrastructure is Guidance to Support Asset Management, Financial Management and Reporting.
Not all countries produce enough food to meet the needs of their populations. Some countries rely on imports to supplement their food supply, while others experience food insecurity due to factors like poor infrastructure, climate change, or political instability.
Infrastructures is the plural of infrastructure
The plural of infrastructure is infrastructures. As in "infrastructures are important".
IRB Infrastructure was created in 1938.
Infrastructure Canada was created in 2002.