both
both
Neither. The art of precognition is not exact. If your predictions are proven correct it is unnecessary to adjust either your prediction or the observations. apex- false
It is important to acknowledge and learn from incorrect predictions by analyzing all observations, including those that don't support the prediction. Changing a prediction based on new information or adjusting the underlying assumptions is a valid practice to improve future predictions. Transparently documenting the rationale behind the change helps maintain credibility and ensures a more accurate predictive model.
It is not scientifically valid to selectively ignore information that contradicts a prediction or change a prediction based on preconceived beliefs. It is important to consider all evidence, even if it goes against the initial prediction, in order to draw valid conclusions and refine future predictions. This approach is fundamental to the scientific method and ensures the integrity of the research process.
Why did you left is grammatically incorrect. It should be: Why did you leave? Why did she leave? Why did he leave? Why did they leave?
No. $34 correct. $ 34 incorrect
That's not incorrect, but "Who are those who leave" would be better.
Yes, but it might not be as readily understood. This is why it is incorrect to leave out the question mark.
i should leave now
You should leave the gift on the altar.
You should leave your gift at the altar.