Whether or not to become a refugee was the decision of the individual. They could attempt to stay in their homes, but usually fled when the fighting got too close. In some places the soldiers would drive people out of their houses, or take them as prisoners and send them to concentration camps. The Allies would have civilians evacuate areas for their safety, but didn't prevent them from returning when it was safe.
They did, Edward VI became king. In the oldern days they made only the boy king as they thought that women were weak and they could be attacked by other countries. This rule still applies to some countries today but it could be changed soon. Hope it helps :)
While filming Lara Croft: Tomb Raider, Angelina traveled to Cambodia- which is where she later adopted her son Maddox. She decided that she was oblivious to the "real world" and started reading books about cultures, and 3rd world countries, refugees, and poverty. She later contacted the UN herself and asked if she could work with them to learn more- they said yes, and she began to learn more about the world she "had little idea about" and later was offered a chance to be the UNHCR Goodwill Ambassador.
The initial crew complement was about 300, but this grew as the station gained strategic importance. By the seventh season, Odo is heard saying that over 800 Starfleet personnel could be assigned to DS9 at one time. This does not include the Bajoran personnel or the civilians who lived on the station. According to the station's blueprints, there are about 1000 cabins on the station, so you can assume about 2000 people could live there comfortably. At one point during a crisis involving refugees, it was said that the station could accommodate up to 7000 people, but that of course is not a normal situation.
He did this so that he could get money
There is a very slim chance that it could happen
If refugees are not allowed into new countries, they may be forced to remain in unsafe or unstable situations in their home countries, leading to continued suffering and hardship. This lack of resettlement opportunities could also exacerbate global refugee crises and strain resources in countries that are already hosting large refugee populations.
i think countries become poor because of of bad country leader. this could lead to very high taxes that countries can not pay for, therefore they get poor.
Refugees and Civil Wars have made it difficult to build healthy economies in the Eastern Mediterranean countries because refugees cannot find work to support themselves and find homes, food, etc. Civil wars are also a problem for the economy of the Eastern Mediterranean countries because they are depleting valuable resources that could be sold as profit such as oil, the principal resource in the Arabian Peninsula.
Ok but they could be treated better
Because there life could be endangered in whatever country they live in and the country couldn't do anything about it if it's not illegal so they would come to a different country where it is illegal
Yes. It was the first war where civilians were targeted. The number of combatant countries that could attack each other's cities added to the civilian devasation.
False!
You cannot directly help refugees, but can give to charitys to help their wellbeing, you could expect a certain standard of the treatment to a refugee in a EU country anyway.
The massive amount of violence in Syria against civilians, perpetrated by the Assad Regime, Jubhat an-Nusra, and the Islamic State, which control the majority of Syria, have caused a large percentage of Syrians to flee the country. Jordan, Lebanon, and Turkey have each taken 1.4 million, 1.9. million, and 2.3 million refugees, but all three have basically argued that they are strained and overtaxed by the refugees that they have taken in and cannot afford to take in anymore, resulting in them closing the borders or, in Turkey's case, turning a blind eye towards Europe-bound migration.As a result, vast numbers of Syrians are taking the long march to Germany and Scandinavia where favorable refugee policies are present and where they do not run the risk of dying unceremoniously as might happen in Syria. Additionally, because of European kindness with regards to refugees, a number of economic migrants are also using the more lenient standards applied to refugees as opposed to migrants to pretend to be Syrians in order to get asylum. The UN High Commissioner for Refugees has no exact statistics, but claims that a significant minority of the "Syrian Refugees" in Europe are Non-Syrian economic migrants, who should not benefit from the asylum procedures that migrants have to deal with, but are engaging in deceptive practices (such as burning their passports) in order to pretend to be Syrians.The reason that many Europeans and Americans are hesitant to settle the million-or-so "Syrian Refugees" comes from two main factors: (1) that the governments of the various countries have not done any serious work to tease out economic migrants from actual Syrian Refugees, who should receive help and sustenance, and (2) the political and religious views of the migrants, regardless of whether they are legitimate refugees or not could have serious consequences for the national identities of a number of European countries. As a result of this failure to settle the refugees and actually determine a course for them, the refugees have been stuck in limbo in numerous refugee camps.
The massive amount of violence in Syria against civilians, perpetrated by the Assad Regime, Jubhat an-Nusra, and the Islamic State, which control the majority of Syria, have cause a large percentage of Syrians to flee the country. Jordan, Lebanon, and Turkey have each taken 1.4 million, 1.9. million, and 2.3 million refugees, but all three have basically argued that they are strained and overtaxed by the refugees that they have taken in and cannot afford to take in anymore, resulting in them closing the borders or, in Turkey's case, turning a blind eye towards Europe-bound migration.As a result, vast numbers of Syrians are taking the long march to Germany and Scandinavia where favorable refugee policies are present and where they do not run the risk of dying unceremoniously as might happen in Syria. Additionally, because of European kindness with regards to refugees, a number of economic migrants are also using the more lenient standards applied to refugees as opposed to migrants to pretend to be Syrians in order to get asylum. The UN High Commissioner for Refugees has no exact statistics, but claims that a significant minority of the "Syrian Refugees" in Europe are Non-Syrian economic migrants, who should not benefit from the asylum procedures that migrants have to deal with, but are engaging in deceptive practices (such as burning their passports) in order to pretend to be Syrians.The reason that many Europeans and Americans are hesitant to settle the million-or-so "Syrian Refugees" comes from two main factors: (1) that the governments of the various countries have not done any serious work to tease out economic migrants from actual Syrian Refugees, who should receive help and sustenance, and (2) the political and religious views of the migrants, regardless of whether they are legitimate refugees or not could have serious consequences for the national identities of a number of European countries. As a result of this failure to settle the refugees and actually determine a course for them, the refugees have been stuck in limbo in numerous refugee camps.
No where as far as I know, except in some cases in Italy only but still that does not worth the period to wait again. Below are the list of countries where they deported the Romanian Refugees: Denmark deported Romanian Refugee Norway did too London is on the top, no chance ................ ........ Actually living in Romania is not that easy for their own people and I wonder how the human rights does not do anything. Most refugees flee the country and when send back, the Romanian government does not take responsibility due to violation of the integration programme. And they stay on their own on the street, parks or have to do hard labors and bribe to be able to get back their passport and then escape back cos they will have nothing there despite the fact of being considered as a refugee. Come on Human Rights Group and have a close watch. Those refugees are hard working and they do work black in other EU countries with a little many. If their refugees could be transferred those countries will benefit from it. They will not be a burden!!! True refugees from Romania doesn't exist. Usually are crooks who assumes a false identity to impress naive in other countries. Don't believe the so called Romanian (generally Gypsies law offenders) "refugees" !
Yes civilians were killed. I have a feeling neither army could be bothered to identify them.