answersLogoWhite

0

Before the SAA, federal agencies had the authority to require an audit of each federally funded program or activity. Thus, audit overlaps and organizational inefficiencies existed as there was no coordination among the federal agencies.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about General Arts & Entertainment

What is a disadvantage to the single audit approach?

some granting agencies do not receive as much information about their grant programs as when separate grant audits are performed. As a result, some granting agencies require audit work that goes beyond the single audit requirement;


What is the purpose of audit working papers?

Audit working papers are used to support the audit work done in order to provide assurance that the audit was performed in accordance with the relevant auditing standards. They show the audit was:Properly planned;Carried out;There was adequate supervision;That the appropriate review was undertaken; & finally and most importantly;That the evidence is sufficient and appropriate to support the audit opinion.


What is an adequacy audit?

It is the review to verify the sufficiency of documentation for defining work and of records as evidence of satisfactory work completion.


Which party owns audit workpapers?

The audit work papers are owned by the auditors, they are designated as the owners of the working papers in an Audit firm in UAE. These papers are confidential between auditor and the client. You can get more information about Auditors or Auditing firm in Dubai at " www . flyingcolourtax . com "


What documentation is not required for an audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards?

In an audit conducted in accordance with Generally Accepted Auditing Standards (GAAS), certain types of documentation are typically not required. While the specific requirements can vary based on the standards applied (e.g., U.S. GAAS, International Standards on Auditing (ISA)), some general categories of documentation that are usually not required include: **1. Personal Correspondence Explanation: Personal or informal communications between employees or management that are not related to the financial statements or audit evidence are generally not required. This includes non-business-related emails or personal notes that do not pertain to the financial reporting process. **2. Irrelevant or Excessive Documentation Explanation: Documentation that does not provide evidence related to the financial statements or audit procedures is not required. This includes excessive or irrelevant supporting documents that do not impact the audit conclusions. **3. Internal Management Reports Not Related to Audit Objectives Explanation: Internal management reports that do not directly relate to the financial statements or audit procedures are not typically required. For example, detailed internal performance reports that are unrelated to financial reporting may not be necessary for the audit. **4. Preliminary or Draft Versions of Documents Explanation: Preliminary or draft versions of financial statements, reports, or other documents that have been revised and finalized are generally not required. The auditor relies on the final, approved versions of documents. **5. Routine Operational Documentation Explanation: Routine operational documentation, such as internal memos or general administrative documents that do not impact the financial statements, is not required. The focus is on documents that provide direct evidence related to the audit objectives. **6. Documentation of Internal Controls Not Directly Impacting the Audit Explanation: While understanding internal controls is crucial, detailed documentation of controls not directly impacting the audit or those not significant to the audit risk assessment may not be required. The emphasis is on controls relevant to the financial reporting process. **7. Personal or Confidential Information Not Relevant to the Audit Explanation: Personal or confidential information that does not pertain to the financial statements or the audit evidence required for financial reporting is generally not required. This includes personal health records or unrelated confidential business information. **8. Historical or Non-Recurring Documentation Explanation: Documentation related to historical or non-recurring transactions that do not affect the current financial statements or audit scope may not be necessary. The auditor focuses on documentation relevant to the current period under audit. Audit Documentation Requirements GAAS Requirements: According to GAAS, auditors are required to document evidence that supports their audit conclusions, including evidence of the procedures performed, the results of those procedures, and the conclusions reached. Documentation should be sufficient to enable an experienced auditor to understand the work performed and the conclusions reached. Objective of Documentation: The primary goal of audit documentation is to support the auditor’s findings and conclusions, provide a basis for the audit report, and ensure compliance with auditing standards. Therefore, documentation must be relevant and related to the audit evidence needed. In summary, documentation that is irrelevant, excessive, or not directly related to the audit objectives is generally not required. The focus is on maintaining documentation that supports the auditor’s conclusions and provides a clear basis for the audit work performed.

Related Questions

What is a disadvantage to the single audit approach?

some granting agencies do not receive as much information about their grant programs as when separate grant audits are performed. As a result, some granting agencies require audit work that goes beyond the single audit requirement;


What is the Audit Work Program?

The Audit Work Program is used to inform both the government and the public about audits. In Australia, for example, they have the Australian National Audit Office.


What is the procedure of the checking the quality of the work in audit organization?

There is no single audit is performing in the company.Like there are many audits are conducted like, Quality control,Finance,Marketing,Production etc So the quality of the AUDIT can be judged through the Results it produced after the audit,and the quality of the Company who is conducting that audit. Through this you can check this out.


What is resource audit?

A resource audit is the process by which employees ensures that the business or a project has all the resources it needs to complete work. Done correctly, resource audits improve efficiency.


What is meant by audit trail?

audit is an evaluation of a person, organization, system, process, project or product .Audits are performed to ascertain the validity and reliability of information, and also provide an assessment of a system's internal control. The goal of an audit is to express an opinion on the person/organization/system etc. under evaluation based on work done on a test basis.Doing a trial process in audit to make it effective is audit trial.


What is the role of an internal auditor as it relates to business finance?

An internal auditor is a company employee who independently and objectively evaluates the organization’s operations. The role of an internal auditor is to gather relevant and objective information about the organization. An internal auditor essentially serves as the eyes and ears of the company’s senior leadership and board of directors. Their assigned work may cover any area of an organization; however, their work should be directed by the audit committee. Internal audits have historically been aligned with accounting and financial reporting audits. However, there are other types of audits example, IT auditss, Operation audits and Performance audits.


What are the types of audits?

Energy Audits can be broken down in several ways. The first is by the type of facility or building:residential (home)commercialand industrial.The second way to categorize audits is by how involved they are. In our case we do heavy commercial and industrial audits, and here are how we categorize our audits:Preliminary Audit: compare your energy use to similar companies.Comprehensive walk through audit: in depth look at your energy bills, your equipment, and your process. This identifies and quantifies energy savings ideas.DIY walk through audit: same as a comprehensive audit, but instead of having the auditor do the leg work, you (or an employee) gather data. You get 70% of the results for less than half the price.These are the most complex - and expensive - studies. They are most often used by major corporations with intensive project approval processes, or by companies looking to implement major (and expensive) technologies. These include wind, solar PV (photo-voltaic), hot water heating, solar heating (passive & active), CHP (Combined Heat Power), CHCP (Combined Heat Cool Power), refrigeration (mechanical & absorption), heat pumps, HVAC, high efficiency electric motors, biomass, and small hydro-electric....In our experience, 95% of companies are better served by a self-walk-through audit. The recommendations are almost as accurate, and their much lower cost makes it easier to justify the investment.


What are the types of energy audits?

Energy Audits can be broken down in several ways. The first is by the type of facility or building:residential (home)commercialand industrial.The second way to categorize audits is by how involved they are. In our case we do heavy commercial and industrial audits, and here are how we categorize our audits:Preliminary Audit: compare your energy use to similar companies.Comprehensive walk through audit: in depth look at your energy bills, your equipment, and your process. This identifies and quantifies energy savings ideas.DIY walk through audit: same as a comprehensive audit, but instead of having the auditor do the leg work, you (or an employee) gather data. You get 70% of the results for less than half the price.These are the most complex - and expensive - studies. They are most often used by major corporations with intensive project approval processes, or by companies looking to implement major (and expensive) technologies. These include wind, solar PV (photo-voltaic), hot water heating, solar heating (passive & active), CHP (Combined Heat Power), CHCP (Combined Heat Cool Power), refrigeration (mechanical & absorption), heat pumps, HVAC, high efficiency electric motors, biomass, and small hydro-electric....In our experience, 95% of companies are better served by a self-walk-through audit. The recommendations are almost as accurate, and their much lower cost makes it easier to justify the investment.


What are the differences and similarities in audits of financial statement compliance audits operational audits?

OPERATIONAL AUDIT. An operational audit is a systematic review and evaluation of an organizational unit to determine whether it is functioning effectively and efficiently, whether it is accomplishing established objectives and goals, and whether it is using all of its resources appropriately. Resources in this context include funds, personnel, property, equipment, materials, information, space, and whatever else may be used by that unit. Operational audits can include evaluations of the work flow and proprietyof performance measurements. These audits are tailored to fit the nature of the operations being reviewed. "Carefully done, operational auditing is a cost-effective way of getting a higher return from the audit function by making it helpful to operating management.COMPLIANCE AUDIT. A compliance audit determines whether the organizational unit or function is following particular rules or directives. Such rules or directives can originate internally or externally and can include one or more of the following: organizational policies; performance plans; established procedures; required authorizations; applicable external regulations; relevant contractualprovisions; and federal, state, and local lawsFINANCIAL AUDIT. A financial audit is an examination of the financial planning and reporting process, the conduct of financial operations, the reliability and integrity of financial records, and the preparation of financial statements. Such a review includes an appraisal of the system of internal controls related to financial function.


What is the difference between an operational audit and a performance audit for an internal audit department?

operational audit means auditing how the operations of a work are going right or not but performance audit means auditing how the performance of a particular work is going right or not


How Financial Audits Are Conducted in Manufacturing Companies?

Manufacturing businesses conduct financial audits to make sure that their financial statements are accurate and accurately reflect the company’s financial health. Financial audits are a crucial part of corporate governance. Also, financial audits give stakeholders—including customers, regulators, and investors—confidence in the company’s financial performance. Here’s how financial audits are conducted in manufacturing companies: Engage an External Audit Firm Manufacturing companies typically engage external audit firms to conduct financial audits. The external audit firm should be independent of the company being audited to ensure that the audit is objective and unbiased. The audit firm will appoint an audit team to conduct the audit, which usually comprises of a team leader, auditors, and support staff. Understand the Company’s Business Processes The audit team will need to understand the company’s business processes, including its operations, accounting systems, financial reporting systems, and controls. The audit team will review the company’s financial statements, balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement to gain an understanding of the company’s financial position and performance. Assess Risk and Materiality The audit team will assess the risk of material misstatements in the financial statements. Materiality is the magnitude of an omission or misstatement that could influence the economic decisions of the users of the financial statements. The audit team will consider various factors when assessing risk and materiality, including the complexity of the company’s operations, the significance of individual transactions, and the accuracy and completeness of the company’s financial records. Perform Tests of Controls The audit team will perform tests of controls to determine whether the company’s internal controls are effective in ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the financial records. The audit team will test the company’s accounting and financial reporting systems to ensure that they comply with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) or international financial reporting standards (IFRS). Conduct Substantive Procedures The audit team will conduct substantive procedures to verify the accuracy and completeness of the financial records. Substantive procedures include tests of transactions, tests of balances, and analytical procedures. The audit team will verify the existence, ownership, and valuation of assets and liabilities, and confirm the accuracy of financial statement disclosures. Issue an Audit Report Once the audit is complete, the audit team will issue an audit report that provides an opinion on the fairness of the company’s financial statements. The audit report will include a statement on the company’s internal controls, an assessment of risk and materiality, and a description of the audit procedures performed. The audit report will also highlight any significant accounting issues or deficiencies in the company’s financial reporting. In manufacturing organisations, financial audits are a crucial part of corporate governance. They aid in ensuring the quality and completeness of the company’s financial statements, giving stakeholders assurance in the financial success of the business. To guarantee the integrity of their financial reporting, manufacturing enterprises must work with reputable and impartial external audit firms.


What role does government play in creating and enforcing auditing standards?

· Organizational independence allows the audit activity to conduct work without interference by the entity under audit. The audit activity should have sufficient independence from those it is required to audit so that it can both conduct its work without interference and be seen to be able to do so. · A formal mandate. The audit activity’s powers and duties should be established by the government’s constitution, charter, or other basic legal document. Among other topics, this document would address procedures and requirements of reporting, the obligation of the audited entity to collaborate with the auditor. · Unrestricted access. Audits should be conducted with complete and unrestricted access to employees, property, and records. · Sufficient funding. The audit activity must have sufficient funding relative to the size of its audit responsibilities. This important element should not be left under the control of the organization under audit because the budget impacts the audit activity’s capacity to carry out its duties. · Competent leadership. The head of the audit activity must be able to effectively recruit, retain, and manage highly skilled staff. Moreover, the chief audit executive should be an articulate public spokesperson for the audit activity. · Competent staff. The audit activity needs a professional staff that collectively has the necessary qualifications and competence to conduct the full range of audits required by its mandate. Auditors must comply with minimum continuing education requirements established by their relevant professional organizations and standards. · Stakeholder support. The legitimacy of the audit activity and its mission should be understood and supported by a broad range of elected and appointed government officials, as well as the media and involved citizens. · Professional audit standards support the implementation of the previous elements and provide a framework to promote quality audit work that is systematic, objective, and based on evidence. Just as many governments have adopted internal control standards — either as requirements or guidance for public sector managers — audit activities should conduct their work in accordance with recognized standards.