Conflict: Rebellion.
Resolution: Death.
There is a mental war between Katniss and President Snow. Snow keeps sending 'messages' to Katniss, in order to scare her. After what happened with the berries in the first book when Katniss and Peeta try to commit suicide, the Capitol is mad at them for showing them up. Throughout the trilogy, the Capitol is desperate to see Katniss and Peeta to death.
The protagonist is Katniss while the antagonist is President Snow. Katniss represents freedom while Snow represents oppression.
Quite literally, there would be no story. To have a story there must be the following:Exposition and rising action (growing tension)The climax (the height of tension in the story)Denoument (falling action), the unravelling of events and resolution.Without that denoument, there is no story; what you have is a news report.Collins could have resolved The Hunger Games trillogy in a dozen different ways--Peeta could have killed Katniss in the first book; Katniss could have killed Peeta in the third book; Gale and Katniss could have run off together in Catching Fire; Snow could have killed all of the tributes in the 74th games--the potentials are endless. It's all speculation.It is possible that you are asking about a specific conflict among the many with in the story. To answer that would require a question that specically addresses the specific conflict.
Katniss & Peeta love eachother ahh
A snake
She won
the main conflict is that katniss is trying to get peeta out alive. katniss is the face of the rebellion and she figures it would be better if she were dead rather than peeta. during the game the arena is destroyed, but some of the tributes still survive.
between the rebels and the capitol is the main conflict but this is shown as katniss being one of the rebel fighting to survive against the capitol's games. The literal conflict is between all the tributes. but mostly katniss and cato
There is a mental war between Katniss and President Snow. Snow keeps sending 'messages' to Katniss, in order to scare her. After what happened with the berries in the first book when Katniss and Peeta try to commit suicide, the Capitol is mad at them for showing them up. Throughout the trilogy, the Capitol is desperate to see Katniss and Peeta to death.
The protagonist is Katniss while the antagonist is President Snow. Katniss represents freedom while Snow represents oppression.
Peeta and katniss get married
Quite literally, there would be no story. To have a story there must be the following:Exposition and rising action (growing tension)The climax (the height of tension in the story)Denoument (falling action), the unravelling of events and resolution.Without that denoument, there is no story; what you have is a news report.Collins could have resolved The Hunger Games trillogy in a dozen different ways--Peeta could have killed Katniss in the first book; Katniss could have killed Peeta in the third book; Gale and Katniss could have run off together in Catching Fire; Snow could have killed all of the tributes in the 74th games--the potentials are endless. It's all speculation.It is possible that you are asking about a specific conflict among the many with in the story. To answer that would require a question that specically addresses the specific conflict.
staying alive in the games
Katniss doesn't kill Prim, Coin does. She does because she was afraid Katniss might want to stand up and be president.
Katniss and Peeta try to break out of the arena
Katniss & Peeta love eachother ahh
KATNISS