The issue in the West v Eisner case is that as a result of Eisners failure to maintaine a standard of care, West lost her workers compensation, resulting in her having no income and causing emotional distress which resulted in a depressive illness suffered by West.
No, the case of McCleskey v Kemp stated that racial discrimination would have to be proved in a defendant's specific case. Justice Powell stated that if he could change his vote in one case this would be the one. It is very difficult to prove that racial discrimination effected the outcome of a case.
There judges were Kenny Beenensee and Kyla Mulnix.
i don't know and i don't care!!
People always say that my musics loud, Sorry for PARTY ROCKIN' the definition is An electric fan that blows hot air out of a computer case, A/V equipment case or other electronic equipment.
The Lee v. Weisman case happened because Principal Lee had a rabbi come and say a prayer at the Nathan Bishop Middle School in Providence, RI and Deborah Weisman's parents objected to that because they were Jewish and thought that the prayer was inappropriate.
Dred Scott v. Sanford
kent v u,s.
Roe V. Wade had people come and discuss the issue and allowed people to have abortions.
Gibbons v. Ogden -- interstate commerce
something somethong FREE SPEECH.---- trust me ;)
The right of the government to seize private property
The right of the government to seize private property
The issue was that Brady due process protected under the 14th amendment were violated due to the fact that the prosecution suppressed evidence from the defense.
Geringer v Wildhorn Ranch is a wrongful death case in Colorado in 1988. Her husband and minor son were drowned when a paddleboat leaked and filled with water. For more detail about this case, visit the Related Link.
apex: do black schools and white schools have equal protection of the law?.. :)
apex: do black schools and white schools have equal protection of the law?.. :)
The issue of sexual privacy with respect to Texas's anti-sodomy law had previously been addressed in the 1986 Bowers v Hardwick case. Lawrence v Texas was decided in 2003 when the supreme court argued in favor of constitutional protection of sexual privacy.