The issue in the West v Eisner case is that as a result of Eisners failure to maintaine a standard of care, West lost her workers compensation, resulting in her having no income and causing emotional distress which resulted in a depressive illness suffered by West.
Delgado v. Bastrop Independent School District was a landmark case decided in 1970 that addressed the issue of discrimination against bilingual students in Texas. The case involved the segregation of Mexican American students in separate classes, which was deemed unconstitutional. The ruling emphasized the need for educational equity and the rights of students to receive instruction in their native language. This case was pivotal in advancing the civil rights of bilingual students in the United States.
No, the case of McCleskey v Kemp stated that racial discrimination would have to be proved in a defendant's specific case. Justice Powell stated that if he could change his vote in one case this would be the one. It is very difficult to prove that racial discrimination effected the outcome of a case.
There judges were Kenny Beenensee and Kyla Mulnix.
Heckler v. Chaney is a significant Supreme Court case from 1985 that addresses the issue of whether federal courts have the authority to compel the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to take enforcement action against drug manufacturers for violations of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. The case arose when Chaney challenged the FDA's decision not to enforce regulations against certain drugs. The Supreme Court ruled that the decision to enforce is largely discretionary and that courts typically do not have jurisdiction to compel agency action in such instances, emphasizing the separation of powers and agency discretion. This ruling reinforced the principle that agencies have broad discretion in their enforcement priorities.
Mendez v. Westminster was a landmark 1947 court case in California that challenged racial segregation in public schools. The case involved a group of Mexican American families who argued that their children were unfairly placed in separate, inferior schools due to their ethnicity, violating their rights under the 14th Amendment. The court ruled in favor of the Mendez family, stating that segregation was unconstitutional, and this decision laid the groundwork for future civil rights cases, including Brown v. Board of Education.
Dred Scott v. Sanford
kent v u,s.
Roe V. Wade had people come and discuss the issue and allowed people to have abortions.
The case of Marbury v. Madison overturned the legal precedent that allowed the Supreme Court to issue writs of mandamus to government officials.
Gibbons v. Ogden -- interstate commerce
something somethong FREE SPEECH.---- trust me ;)
The right of the government to seize private property
The right of the government to seize private property
The issue was that Brady due process protected under the 14th amendment were violated due to the fact that the prosecution suppressed evidence from the defense.
Geringer v Wildhorn Ranch is a wrongful death case in Colorado in 1988. Her husband and minor son were drowned when a paddleboat leaked and filled with water. For more detail about this case, visit the Related Link.
Case Citation:Baker v. Carr, 369 US 186 (1962)
apex: do black schools and white schools have equal protection of the law?.. :)