0
What else can I help you with?
How many judges comprised the Court which decided Salomon v Salomon?
The Court of Appeal that decided Salomon v. Salomon & Co. Ltd. in 1897 comprised three judges: Lord Justice Lindley, Lord Justice A.L. Smith, and Lord Justice Davey. The case is significant for establishing the principle of separate legal personality for corporations, affirming that a company is distinct from its shareholders.
Looking at the McCleskey v Kemp was it morally resolved?
No, the case of McCleskey v Kemp stated that racial discrimination would have to be proved in a defendant's specific case. Justice Powell stated that if he could change his vote in one case this would be the one. It is very difficult to prove that racial discrimination effected the outcome of a case.
How did the court case reed v reed effect the government?
i don't know and i don't care!!
What does case fan?
People always say that my musics loud, Sorry for PARTY ROCKIN' the definition is An electric fan that blows hot air out of a computer case, A/V equipment case or other electronic equipment.
What was the issue in the eisner v west case?
The issue in the West v Eisner case is that as a result of Eisners failure to maintaine a standard of care, West lost her workers compensation, resulting in her having no income and causing emotional distress which resulted in a depressive illness suffered by West.
How many judges ruled in favor of Linda Brown in the Brown v Board of Education of Topeka case?
All of them A+
How many judges sat on the bench to hear the landmark case of Keshavananda Bharati v State of Kerala in 1973?
9
What famous court case resulted from Adams nominating Midnight Judges?
Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803)
What important precedent did john marshall set in the case of marbury v. Madison?
The principle of judicial review, that is, the ability of judges to declare laws unconstitutional.
What important precedent did john Marshall set in case of marbury v. Madison?
The principle of judicial review, that is, the ability of judges to declare laws unconstitutional.
How many supreme court judges have hear a case and appeal it?
Most cases are heard by the full Court of nine justices. However, in the even of an emergency, the Court can hear any case with a minimum of 6 judges. If a tie were to happen, the decision would side with what the lower court had decided. As in the case of Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896, when 8 judges were present, ties rarely happen in this situation.
What Supreme Court case was the result the midnight judges?
Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803)For more information, see Related Questions, below.
How many women judges were on the supreme court in the roe vs wade case?
During the Roe v. Wade case, which was decided in 1973, there were no women judges on the U.S. Supreme Court. The Court at that time consisted of nine male justices. It wasn't until 1981, when Sandra Day O'Connor was appointed, that the Supreme Court had its first female justice.
In what case did the Supreme Court rule that state laws requiring judges to retire at 70 years of aged do not violate federal law?
Gregory v. Ashcroft, 501 U.S. 452 (1991)
How many judges comprised the Court which decided Salomon v Salomon?
The Court of Appeal that decided Salomon v. Salomon & Co. Ltd. in 1897 comprised three judges: Lord Justice Lindley, Lord Justice A.L. Smith, and Lord Justice Davey. The case is significant for establishing the principle of separate legal personality for corporations, affirming that a company is distinct from its shareholders.
What court room in the UK has 5 judges deciding upon the outcome?
I am studing the case R V G in which there is dispute over a 15 year old having sex with a 12 year old and how he should be charged. I have 5 judges interpretations on the outcome but can't work out who actually gave the verdict or if it was a joint effort.
Which US Supreme Court case established a gatekeeping function of judges with respect to admitting scientific evidence?
The US Supreme Court case that established a gatekeeping function for judges regarding the admission of scientific evidence is Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (1993). In this decision, the Court ruled that judges must assess the relevance and reliability of expert testimony before it can be presented to a jury. The Daubert standard requires judges to evaluate scientific evidence based on criteria like testability, peer review, and error rates, thus ensuring that only credible scientific evidence is admitted in court.
