0
Which US Supreme Court case established a gatekeeping function of judges with respect to admitting scientific evidence?
The US Supreme Court case that established a gatekeeping function for judges regarding the admission of scientific evidence is Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (1993). In this decision, the Court ruled that judges must assess the relevance and reliability of expert testimony before it can be presented to a jury. The Daubert standard requires judges to evaluate scientific evidence based on criteria like testability, peer review, and error rates, thus ensuring that only credible scientific evidence is admitted in court.
What else can I help you with?
Which case ruled that scientific evidence was admissible only if it was generally accepted by the scientific?
The case you are referring to is Frye v. United States (1923). This ruling established the Frye standard, which stated that scientific evidence is admissible in court only if it is generally accepted within the relevant scientific community.
How are scientific evidence and scientific conclusions related?
Scientific conclusions are based on scientific evidence.
Which of these best describes the basis on which new scientific ideas are accepted or rejected?
New scientific ideas are typically accepted or rejected based on the evidence supporting them. Ideas that are consistent with experimental data and can be replicated by other researchers are more likely to be accepted. Conversely, ideas that lack evidence or are inconsistent with established scientific principles are more likely to be rejected.
What does scientifically accurate mean?
Scientifically accurate means that the information or data presented is supported by scientific research, experimentation, and evidence. It is based on established scientific principles and has been rigorously tested and verified by the scientific community.
What would happen if correct new evidence was discovered that did not agree with a well established scientific theory?
The theory would be modified or replaced.
What is scientific accuracy?
Scientific accuracy refers to the extent to which information, findings, or conclusions presented align with established scientific understanding and evidence. It involves ensuring that research methods are rigorous, data are correctly interpreted, and conclusions are supported by evidence. Maintaining scientific accuracy is crucial to uphold the reliability and credibility of scientific knowledge.
What is the difference between a hypothesis and a theory in the field of scientific research?
In scientific research, a hypothesis is a proposed explanation for a phenomenon based on limited evidence, while a theory is a well-established and widely accepted explanation that has been extensively tested and supported by evidence.
What is the meaning of humility in scientific attitude?
Humility in scientific attitude means being open to new ideas, admitting mistakes, and being willing to revise beliefs in light of new evidence. It involves recognizing the limitations of one's knowledge and expertise, and valuing the contributions of others in advancing scientific understanding.
A scientific explanation of natural occurrence is called?
A scientific explanation of a natural occurrence is called a theory or a hypothesis, depending on the level of evidence and support behind it. Theories are well-established explanations supported by a large body of evidence, while hypotheses are proposed explanations that require further testing and evidence to confirm.
What is the definition of Scientific Evidence Appeal?
Scientific evidence is facts or evidence that is used to prove or disprove a scientific theory. Scientific evidence appeal is when new finding or statistics are brought to light that disprove some or all of the previous evidence's findings.
When a theory has been established a it cannot change b it must become law c it may be altered or changed or d it becomes accepted scientific principle?
Once a theory is established, it both becomes accepted scientific principle and may be altered or changed at a later point (normally upon discovery of new evidence or through revaluation of existing evidence).
What does the word anecdotally mean?
Ancedotally normally refers to evidence that is based on less scientific evidence but evidence that appears to back up the stronger scientific evidence. It adds weight to scientific evidence but is not necessarily proven.
