answersLogoWhite

0

The case you are referring to is Frye v. United States (1923). This ruling established the Frye standard, which stated that scientific evidence is admissible in court only if it is generally accepted within the relevant scientific community.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

1y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Information Science

Scientific and technological Discoveries are accepted if their evdicence can be?

Scientific and technological discoveries are accepted if their evidence can be empirically validated through rigorous experimentation, observation, and analysis. Consistent replication of results by multiple researchers and the ability to make predictions based on the discovery also contribute to its acceptance within the scientific community.


Why were Wegener's ideas not immediately accepted by the scientific commu?

Wegener's ideas were not immediately accepted because he lacked a mechanism to explain how continents could move. Additionally, his theory challenged long-standing geological beliefs and there was not enough evidence at the time to support his hypothesis of continental drift. It was not until the development of the theory of plate tectonics in the 1960s that Wegener's ideas gained widespread acceptance.


What is the difference between scientific and non-scientific statements?

Scientific statements are based on evidence, observation, and experimentation, following the scientific method to ensure accuracy and reliability. Non-scientific statements may lack empirical evidence, rely on personal beliefs or opinions, or be based on subjective experiences rather than objective data.


What is the scientific name of ghosts?

There is no scientific evidence to support the existence of ghosts, so there is no scientific name for them. Ghosts are often considered to be a paranormal or supernatural phenomenon that is not recognized by the scientific community.


What is the scientific name for the loch ness monster?

The scientific name for the Loch Ness monster is not real, as the creature is considered to be a myth or legend. There is no scientific evidence to support its existence.

Related Questions

Are text messages admissible as evidence in court?

Yes, text messages are generally admissible as evidence in court, as long as they meet the requirements for authenticity and relevance.


Is video evidence admissible in court?

Yes, video evidence is generally admissible in court as long as it meets certain criteria, such as being relevant, authentic, and not unfairly prejudicial.


Are text messages admissible as evidence in civil court proceedings?

Yes, text messages are generally admissible as evidence in civil court proceedings, as long as they are relevant to the case and can be authenticated to prove their accuracy and origin.


Are confessions to a priest admissible in court?

Confessions made to a priest are generally considered confidential and protected by the priest-penitent privilege, which means they are not admissible in court as evidence.


How is Frye Standard used in courts?

Scientific evidence is allowed into the courtroom if it is generally accepted by the relevant scientific community. It does not offer any guidance on reliability. the evidence is presented in the trial and the jury decides if it can be used.


What is the Frye standard state?

The Frye standard, established in the 1923 case Frye v. United States, dictates that scientific evidence is admissible in court only if it is "generally accepted" by the relevant scientific community. This standard focuses on the reliability and acceptance of the methodology used rather than the validity of the evidence itself. It emphasizes the importance of peer review and widespread acknowledgment within the scientific field, making it a benchmark for the admissibility of expert testimony in legal proceedings.


Are palm prints and fingerprints inadmissible of admissible?

Admissible as evidence


How do you use admissible in a sentence?

Your mode of dress is not admissible in court. The evidence cries to be admissible, your honor!


Which of these best describes the basis on which new scientific ideas are accepted or rejected?

New scientific ideas are typically accepted or rejected based on the evidence supporting them. Ideas that are consistent with experimental data and can be replicated by other researchers are more likely to be accepted. Conversely, ideas that lack evidence or are inconsistent with established scientific principles are more likely to be rejected.


Is not admissible evidence in court?

Hearsay


Why a new scientific hypothesis might be accepted or rejected?

Observational evidence


How can Scientific and technological discoveries be accepted by evidence?

repeated .... nova net :))