0
What else can I help you with?
Is a scientific hypothesis accepted if there is no way to demonstrate the hypothesis wrong?
A scientific hypothesis is not accepted if there is no way to demonstrate the hypothesis wrong. In fact, if there is no way to demonstrate the hypothesis wrong, then it is unfalsifiable and unscientific. For example, if I hypothesize that an all-powerful being created the Universe, there is no way to demonstrate that this hypothesis is wrong. One might argue that none of the natural laws of science require the intervention of an all-powerful being, but then I would simply argue that is because the being designed things that way. Because I can come up with any unfalsifiable explanation for any objection not only is there no way to demonstrate that my hypothesis is wrong, there is also no scientific reason or evidence to believe it is right.
What is a predicted answer to a scientific question?
what is a predicted anserw to a scientific question is hypothesis bacuse hypothesis , a prediction is the same as predicted hypothesis, a prediction about what the anserw to their question might be
What is the scientific definition of a hypothesis?
A hypothesis is a proposed explanation for an observable phenomenon. It can also be said as predicting.For example Horse and Carabao manure which is better. Your hypothesis might be "Carabao manure might be better" or Horse manure might be better". A hypothesis can only be said one if it uses the words might,maybe,probably,if,etc.
What is the correct order for using the scientific method?
The scientific method typically follows these steps: first, make observations and ask a question; next, conduct background research; then, formulate a hypothesis; followed by conducting experiments to test the hypothesis. After analyzing the data, you draw conclusions and may communicate your findings. If necessary, you might revise your hypothesis and repeat the process to refine your understanding.
Why would a scientist change their hypothesis?
In the face of evidence. A Hypothesis is an idea about how something works or will work. Once a test is performed (normally an experiment or a set of observations) then the hypothesis might need to be "refined" or changed to explain the new data. Once a Hypothesis survives all the experiments that people can throw, by correctly predicting their outcomes, then it becomes the "Accepted Theory" for the problem.
When new information conflicts with a hypothesis the hypothesis?
When new information conflicts with a hypothesis, the hypothesis may need to be re-evaluated or revised. This process is essential in scientific inquiry, as it helps refine our understanding of a phenomenon. If the conflicting evidence is substantial, the hypothesis might be rejected altogether in favor of a more accurate explanation. Ultimately, this iterative process is crucial for advancing knowledge and ensuring that scientific conclusions are based on the best available evidence.
Is a scientific hypothesis accepted if there is no way to demonstrate the hypothesis wrong?
A scientific hypothesis is not accepted if there is no way to demonstrate the hypothesis wrong. In fact, if there is no way to demonstrate the hypothesis wrong, then it is unfalsifiable and unscientific. For example, if I hypothesize that an all-powerful being created the Universe, there is no way to demonstrate that this hypothesis is wrong. One might argue that none of the natural laws of science require the intervention of an all-powerful being, but then I would simply argue that is because the being designed things that way. Because I can come up with any unfalsifiable explanation for any objection not only is there no way to demonstrate that my hypothesis is wrong, there is also no scientific reason or evidence to believe it is right.
What is a predicted answer to a scientific question?
what is a predicted anserw to a scientific question is hypothesis bacuse hypothesis , a prediction is the same as predicted hypothesis, a prediction about what the anserw to their question might be
Is a scientific hypothesis accepted as true after an experiments conclusion seems to support it?
Not always. This is kind of hard to explain but sometimes, one of your variables will make the whole expirement kinda slide and the data might be wrong. Just asking, is this a science fair project :D
What is the definition of scientific hypothesis?
A hypothesis is a proposed explanation for an observable phenomenon. It can also be said as predicting.For example Horse and Carabao manure which is better. Your hypothesis might be "Carabao manure might be better" or Horse manure might be better". A hypothesis can only be said one if it uses the words might,maybe,probably,if,etc.
What is the scientific definition of a hypothesis?
A hypothesis is a proposed explanation for an observable phenomenon. It can also be said as predicting.For example Horse and Carabao manure which is better. Your hypothesis might be "Carabao manure might be better" or Horse manure might be better". A hypothesis can only be said one if it uses the words might,maybe,probably,if,etc.
What is a hypothesis that does not explain an observation?
When you are using the scientific method, you would try to imagine a hypothesis which explains an observation, but you might not succeed. A hypothesis that does not explain an observation would be considered a failed hypothesis. You would then need to invent a different hypothesis.
What does waitlisted mean?
It means that you have neither been accepted nor rejected. If someone else drops out, or if they need to accept more people for any reason, you might be accepted later on.
Why do scientific ideas change?
Scientific information constantly changes as new information is discovered or as previous hypotheses are retested. New information can lead to changes in scientific theories. When new facts are revealed, a current scientific theory might be revised to include the new facts, or it might be disproved and rejected.
What is the mean of a null hypothesis being rejected?
the hypothesis might be correct* * * * *The available evidence suggests that the observations were less likely to have been obtained from random variables that were distributed according to the null hypothesis than under the alternative hypothesis against which the null was tested.
Two reason why an experiment might not support a hypothesis even when the hypothesis is correct?
An experiment might not support a hypothesis even if the hypothesis is correct because if the conclusion
What is the correct order for using the scientific method?
The scientific method typically follows these steps: first, make observations and ask a question; next, conduct background research; then, formulate a hypothesis; followed by conducting experiments to test the hypothesis. After analyzing the data, you draw conclusions and may communicate your findings. If necessary, you might revise your hypothesis and repeat the process to refine your understanding.
