0
What else can I help you with?
In scientific method An hypothesis is accepted when it is above the cut-off value and it is rejected when it is below the cut-off value. If our statistical analysis shows that the significance level i?
If the statistical analysis shows that the significance level is below the predetermined alpha level (cut-off value), then the hypothesis is rejected. This suggests that there is enough evidence to believe that the results are not due to random chance. If the significance level is above the alpha level, then the hypothesis is accepted, indicating that the results are not statistically significant and may be due to random variation.
Have you ever considered the theory of human evolution proposed by the stoned ape mushrooms hypothesis?
The stoned ape mushrooms hypothesis, proposed by Terence McKenna, suggests that human evolution may have been influenced by the consumption of psychedelic mushrooms by early humans. This theory is not widely accepted in the scientific community and is considered controversial.
Is natural selection a fact or theory?
Natural selection is a scientific theory proposed by Charles Darwin to explain how species evolve over time. It is based on strong evidence from observations and experiments, making it widely accepted as a fundamental mechanism of evolution.
Do Darwin's argument was scientific?
Yes. Even though Darwin called the Origin " one long " argument " the book was well supported by the evidence of the day and gave ways to falsify the material in the book,. hypothesis for testing and predictions on what would be found that turned out to be quite accurate. So, scientific.
Is the Lucy evolution hoax a widely accepted theory in the scientific community?
No, the Lucy evolution hoax is not a widely accepted theory in the scientific community. The discovery of the fossil known as Lucy, an early human ancestor, has been extensively studied and confirmed by multiple experts in the field of paleoanthropology.
What is the difference between a scientific theory and a hunch?
A hunch is unsubstantiated. Scientific theory is theory in which an idea or even a hunch has been thouroughly tested- thru a hypothesis, testing the hypothesis, and results based on the scientific method. It is supported by other experiments and generally accepted by professionals in the field
Is a scientific hypothesis accepted if there is no way to demonstrate that it is wrong?
It is accepted if the data support it.
Is a scientist hypothesis accepted if there is no way to prove that they hypothesis is wrong?
If you develop an experiment that truly demonstrates that the hypothesis is wrong*, then the hypothesis will lose its acceptance in the scientific community. * Such an experiment would have to be repeatable by other scientists AND accepted by interested scientists as a proof that the hypothesis is wrong.
Is a scientific hypothesis a accepted if there is no way to demonstrate that the hypothesis is wrong?
If you develop an experiment that truly demonstrates that the hypothesis is wrong*, then the hypothesis will lose its acceptance in the scientific community.* Such an experiment would have to be repeatable by other scientists AND accepted by interested scientists as a proof that the hypothesis is wrong.
A published hypothesis is accepted by the scientific community should be tested by the scientific community does not need to be tested becomes a scientific law?
A published hypothesis is accepted by the scientific community as a proposed explanation for a phenomenon but must undergo rigorous testing and validation through experiments and observations. If consistently supported by evidence, it may contribute to the development of a scientific theory, rather than becoming a scientific law. Scientific laws describe observable phenomena under specific conditions and are generally concise statements, while theories provide broader explanations. Therefore, a hypothesis does not automatically become a scientific law; it requires substantial evidence to be widely accepted and understood.
Why is it important for experiments to be written in scientific method?
All experiments are based on hypothesis that has to be tested for truth. All scientific experiments therefore follow a logical methodology to arrive at a conclusion that must have a universal result that becomes universal accepted truth in Scientific experiments. It is necessary to follow the universal methodology by collection of the data for analysis to determine the elements or functional relationship in the experimental process. It is similar to any mathematical function that proceeds from one step to the next with the application of a universal formula that is written when solved.
What happens if more than one hypothesis is put forward to explain the same observations?
For a hypothesis to be put forward as a scientific hypothesis, the scientific method requires that one can test it. A working hypothesis is a provisionally accepted hypothesis proposed for further research.
What is a conclusion based on information?
A conclusion sums up all your observations,inference, and hypothesis in the experiment based on the data collected. This is to prove whether your hypothesis is accepted or rejected.
What is the proper order of the steps of the scientific method?
The proper order of the steps of the scientific method typically includes: 1) making observations, 2) formulating a hypothesis, 3) conducting experiments to test the hypothesis, 4) analyzing the data, and 5) drawing conclusions. Based on the results, the hypothesis may be accepted, rejected, or revised. Finally, the findings are often shared with the scientific community.
If a hypothesis is supported by several experiments it may become a(n)?
If a hypothesis is supported by several experiments, it may become a theory. A theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that is based on a body of evidence and has withstood rigorous testing. Unlike a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, a theory is more established and widely accepted within the scientific community.
Why a new scientific hypothesis might be accepted or rejected?
Observational evidence
What determines if a scientific conclusion is accurate or not?
A conclusion is accepted if its Results can be duplicated in any Lab, anywhere.
