answersLogoWhite

0

Not always. This is kind of hard to explain but sometimes, one of your variables will make the whole expirement kinda slide and the data might be wrong. Just asking, is this a science fair project :D

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

BlakeBlake
As your older brother, I've been where you are—maybe not exactly, but close enough.
Chat with Blake
ViviVivi
Your ride-or-die bestie who's seen you through every high and low.
Chat with Vivi
ReneRene
Change my mind. I dare you.
Chat with Rene
More answers

No, a hypothesis is not considered accepted as true even if an experiment seems to support it. Further experiments and testing are needed to confirm the validity and reliability of the hypothesis. Scientific claims are subject to ongoing scrutiny and revision based on new evidence and data.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

9mo ago
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Is a scientific hypothesis accepted as true after an experiments conclusion seems to support it?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Biology

In scientific method An hypothesis is accepted when it is above the cut-off value and it is rejected when it is below the cut-off value. If our statistical analysis shows that the significance level i?

If the statistical analysis shows that the significance level is below the predetermined alpha level (cut-off value), then the hypothesis is rejected. This suggests that there is enough evidence to believe that the results are not due to random chance. If the significance level is above the alpha level, then the hypothesis is accepted, indicating that the results are not statistically significant and may be due to random variation.


Have you ever considered the theory of human evolution proposed by the stoned ape mushrooms hypothesis?

The stoned ape mushrooms hypothesis, proposed by Terence McKenna, suggests that human evolution may have been influenced by the consumption of psychedelic mushrooms by early humans. This theory is not widely accepted in the scientific community and is considered controversial.


Is natural selection a fact or theory?

Natural selection is a scientific theory proposed by Charles Darwin to explain how species evolve over time. It is based on strong evidence from observations and experiments, making it widely accepted as a fundamental mechanism of evolution.


Do Darwin's argument was scientific?

Yes, Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection is considered a scientific argument. It is based on evidence from various fields such as biology, geology, and paleontology, and has been supported by further scientific research since its introduction. The theory has stood the test of time and is widely accepted in the scientific community.


Is the Lucy evolution hoax a widely accepted theory in the scientific community?

No, the Lucy evolution hoax is not a widely accepted theory in the scientific community. The discovery of the fossil known as Lucy, an early human ancestor, has been extensively studied and confirmed by multiple experts in the field of paleoanthropology.